Going to Work
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Nick Finnigan on 15 Feb 2010 17:55 Bod wrote: > On 15/02/2010 17:50, Nick Finnigan wrote: >>> >>> If there is a vehicle blocking his move into L1 what is his alternative? >> >> "staying in the right hand lane as the other car turns left." > > > > > What if the left hand lane car is going to the next exit after the lane > two car? There is no single alternative. Often the best option is to put your foot down and drive.
From: DavidR on 15 Feb 2010 18:33 "Mr Pounder" <MrPounder(a)RationalThought.com> wrote > "DavidR" <curedham(a)4bidden.org.uk> wrote >> "Mr Pounder" <MrPounder(a)RationalThought.com> wrote >>> "DavidR" <curedham(a)4bidden.org.uk> wrote in message >> >>>> Your story still doesn't hold together very well. >>> >>> Story?? >> >> Very well, your account. It's impossible to get a dispassionate feel of >> what happened. > > I did add a few more details in later postings. Didn't help. Sorry.
From: Mr Pounder on 16 Feb 2010 13:51 "Bod" <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message news:7ttlocFd4sU1(a)mid.individual.net... > On 15/02/2010 19:21, Mr Pounder wrote: >> "'Nel'"<who(a)where.com> wrote in message >> news:%6_dn.61654$Fj2.8348(a)newsfe20.ams2... >>> >>> "Mr Pounder"<MrPounder(a)RationalThought.com> wrote in message >>> news:PqTdn.39969$Ym4.33593(a)text.news.virginmedia.com... >>>> >>>> "'Nel'"<who(a)where.com> wrote in message >>>> news:EcQdn.118400$RP4.115737(a)newsfe03.ams2... >>>>>>> Why don't you tell the truth! You lost your temper and rammed him >>>>>>> off >>>>>>> the road. >>>>>>> You're always doing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bod >>>>>> >>>>>> Now see here Gonad! >>>>>> This is a serious newsgroup and your nonsense will not be tolerated. >>>>> >>>>> Serious newsgroup? You're having a laugh, aren't you?? >>>> >>>> Yes. >>> >>> Oh, that's OK then! :-) >> >> Somebody has to keep this Bod in place. >> The man has a mouth like Portsmouth. >> >> Mr Pounder >>> >> >> > How are they treating you in the care home Mr Pounder? > > Bod Nurse Lynn is very good to me. Mr Pounder
From: Mortimer on 18 Feb 2010 18:43 "Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel(a)lineone.net> wrote in message news:d6hrn5lv4bf7raaq2vam28tjegc37cn2s3(a)4ax.com... >>He would have driven into me, not me into him. >>I am a careful driver mate; I do a lot of miles per year. This is the >>first >>time this has happened to me. >> > > "He would have driven into me, not me into him" > > FFS, was either of you stationary? You'd have driven into each other! No, not necessarily. If the other driver's front hit the OP's side, then the OP's car would not have hit the other driver's car. Only if the fronts of the two vehicles had collided would the two vehicles each have hit the other.
From: Mortimer on 18 Feb 2010 18:45
"Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel(a)lineone.net> wrote in message news:gtgrn59sma21eb3r3b34kdcslhdufcr2ng(a)4ax.com... >> It's in the Highway Code that you give way to your right on roundabouts. >> > > No, it is not. Exactly. Traffic joining a roundabout gives way to traffic on its right which is already on the roundabout, but there is no rule defined for two vehicles alongside each other, both of which are already on the roundabout - which is what "It's in the Highway Code that you give way to your right on roundabouts" could imply. |