How many die later from serious injuries on our roads?
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Norman Wells on 26 Feb 2010 04:15 Marie wrote: > On Feb 25, 6:08 pm, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >> Yes its easier to just kill pedestrians than to interfere with >> motoring. > > Oh look, a bit more bollox posted by Doug at the end. Anyone's risk of dying as a pedestrian or cyclist as a result of a road accident that is the fault of the driver or his vehicle is just 1 in 4000 lifetimes, or once in approximately 320,000 years. So, actually, it's really quite hard to kill pedestrians.
From: Adrian on 26 Feb 2010 04:46 "Norman Wells" <cut-me-own-throat(a)dibblers-pies.co.am> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>> Yes its easier to just kill pedestrians than to interfere with >>> motoring. >> Oh look, a bit more bollox posted by Doug at the end. > Anyone's risk of dying as a pedestrian or cyclist as a result of a road > accident that is the fault of the driver or his vehicle is just 1 in > 4000 lifetimes, or once in approximately 320,000 years. You're forgetting one important detail, though. 100% of people injured in road crashes die later. EVERY SINGLE ONE of them. Something. Must. Be. Done.
From: Bod on 26 Feb 2010 04:54 On 26/02/2010 09:46, Adrian wrote: > "Norman Wells"<cut-me-own-throat(a)dibblers-pies.co.am> gurgled happily, > sounding much like they were saying: > >>>> Yes its easier to just kill pedestrians than to interfere with >>>> motoring. > >>> Oh look, a bit more bollox posted by Doug at the end. > >> Anyone's risk of dying as a pedestrian or cyclist as a result of a road >> accident that is the fault of the driver or his vehicle is just 1 in >> 4000 lifetimes, or once in approximately 320,000 years. > > You're forgetting one important detail, though. > > 100% of people injured in road crashes die later. EVERY SINGLE ONE of > them. > > Something. Must. Be. Done. > > Yes, especially as, EVEN witnesses suffer the same fate! Bod
From: Adrian on 26 Feb 2010 05:23 Bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>>>> Yes its easier to just kill pedestrians than to interfere with >>>>> motoring. >>>> Oh look, a bit more bollox posted by Doug at the end. >>> Anyone's risk of dying as a pedestrian or cyclist as a result of a >>> road accident that is the fault of the driver or his vehicle is just 1 >>> in 4000 lifetimes, or once in approximately 320,000 years. >> You're forgetting one important detail, though. >> >> 100% of people injured in road crashes die later. EVERY SINGLE ONE of >> them. >> >> Something. Must. Be. Done. > Yes, especially as, EVEN witnesses suffer the same fate! <slaps forehead> Migod! You're right! It's worse than we thought!
From: Adrian on 26 Feb 2010 07:14
Phil W Lee <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>>>>>> Yes its easier to just kill pedestrians than to interfere with >>>>>>> motoring. >>>>>> Oh look, a bit more bollox posted by Doug at the end. >>>>> Anyone's risk of dying as a pedestrian or cyclist as a result of a >>>>> road accident that is the fault of the driver or his vehicle is just >>>>> 1 in 4000 lifetimes, or once in approximately 320,000 years. >>>> You're forgetting one important detail, though. >>>> >>>> 100% of people injured in road crashes die later. EVERY SINGLE ONE of >>>> them. >>>> >>>> Something. Must. Be. Done. >>> Yes, especially as, EVEN witnesses suffer the same fate! >><slaps forehead> >>Migod! You're right! >> >>It's worse than we thought! > Up to a point, Lord Copper. > At least the perpetrator is subject to the same fate. Hmm. Surely even Duhg would not regard the death penalty as too lenient a fate for Motorists Who Kill? |