From: D Walford on 6 Aug 2010 07:06 On 6/08/2010 5:11 PM, John McKenzie wrote: > You've got to make a choice, and I reckon you are posting here for a bit > of encouragement to go through with it. So there it is laid out, you'll > certainly not lose the respect of anyone here if you make the hard but > right choice on the issue. > > Agreed, there are times when someone has to put their hand up and do something about such a situation. I just hope my mum is wise enough to know when her driving is no longer up to scratch because most likely I'll get the job of telling her. Daryl
From: atec77 on 6 Aug 2010 08:14 On 6/08/2010 9:06 PM, D Walford wrote: > On 6/08/2010 5:11 PM, John McKenzie wrote: > >> You've got to make a choice, and I reckon you are posting here for a bit >> of encouragement to go through with it. So there it is laid out, you'll >> certainly not lose the respect of anyone here if you make the hard but >> right choice on the issue. >> >> > Agreed, there are times when someone has to put their hand up and do > something about such a situation. > I just hope my mum is wise enough to know when her driving is no longer > up to scratch because most likely I'll get the job of telling her. > > > Daryl hen my Mum stopped driving cars she bought the fastest cart thing I have ever seen , and used it flat out on the foot path no one was safe crazy as a loon -- X-No-Archive: Yes
From: John Tserkezis on 6 Aug 2010 20:38 Milton wrote: > My thoughts too. Imagine if he killed someone (let alone a little kid) > and you knew you could have done something to prevent it. Agreed. How many grandkids need to get run over before the family realises the son-in-law wasn't such a prick after all. Opinions can be changed. Sometimes easily, sometimes with difficulty, but they can be changed. Dead children stay that way. Remind the family of that.
From: George W Frost on 6 Aug 2010 21:00 "Milton" <millame23(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c5ca503$0$11113$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > ans > My thoughts too. Imagine if he killed someone (let alone a little kid) and > you knew you could have done something to prevent it. > > Regards > > Milton Not really a feasible statement Milton as there are lots of drivers who would be worse. Do you stop each and every driver from driving, just in case they may happen to run over a child? The potential is there each and every time any driver goes out on the road
From: Milton on 7 Aug 2010 02:22
"George W Frost" <georgewfrost(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:If27o.2766$FH2.572(a)viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com... > > "Milton" <millame23(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:4c5ca503$0$11113$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... >> > ans >> My thoughts too. Imagine if he killed someone (let alone a little kid) >> and you knew you could have done something to prevent it. >> >> Regards >> >> Milton > > Not really a feasible statement Milton as there are lots of drivers who > would be worse. > Do you stop each and every driver from driving, just in case they may > happen to run over a child? > The potential is there each and every time any driver goes out on the road Sometimes you surprise me George. You appear not to read correctly. Hopefully that is the case. Did you read this in the OP?? "His vision seems barely good enough with driving glasses on but he refuses to go to see the optometrist to get his eyes checked again" What we are saying here George is the OP is aware his FI-L can't see properly and chooses to perhaps ignore it for fear of retribution. Now by your response, would you also refuse to "dob" your FI-L in also for the same reason? If that is the case you are NOT the man I thought you were. Regards Milton |