Interesting that our govt allows ILLEGALS to hold protest rallies but tea-partiers are harrassed.
in [Drive]
|
Prev: Cellulitis gravis
Next: Interesting that our govt allows ILLEGALS to hold protest rallies but tea-partiers are harrassed.
From: climber on 2 May 2010 08:31 On May 1, 3:38 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers Are Murderers" <threeb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Bammer is a traitor and is totally controlled by Big Business and they > love illegals and those $4 wages with no benefits. Does anyone support that miserable collection of swine called Congress and the Executive? America needs a total breakdown and rebuild. climber of interest: http://www.stormfront.org/ Stormfront (fine forums) http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/ Vanguard News Network
From: Charlie on 2 May 2010 10:07 On May 2, 8:31 am, climber <coledenk...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 1, 3:38 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers Are Murderers" > > <threeb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Bammer is a traitor and is totally controlled by Big Business and they > > love illegals and those $4 wages with no benefits. > > Does anyone support that miserable collection of swine called Congress > and the > Executive? America needs a total breakdown and rebuild. > > climber > > of interest: > > http://www.stormfront.org/ Stormfront (fine forums) > > http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/ Vanguard News Network What's sad about illegals is the fact they do siphon off social services which in turn increases the working men and women in this country payment of taxes. Even Hispanic citizens of this country don't get it, they're paying for their free health care and schooling. My Mother in Law was a Principal in Placentia, California years ago and told me that 20% of each class were children of illegals....who pays for their education? When people on Social Security didn't receive a cost of living increase this year, why was that? I'm all for Hispanic's coming to this country as long as they work, pay taxes and obey the laws, even illegals. But at least document them, give them their green cards but tell them it doesn't mean they get citizenship. If they come to this country to have children, that child should not receive automatic US citizenship either. NO NO! If they don't follow the rules then Whites should start boycotting everything Mexican including food products and restaurants even if owned by Non Hispanics. Boycott them like they're going to boycott Arizona and penalize that State. Liberals want amnesty for these people because they need to remain in power because they know they'll get their votes at some point. NO AMNESTY.
From: Stephan Rothstein on 2 May 2010 13:30 richard wrote: > On Sun, 02 May 2010 09:54:53 -0500, Omelet wrote: > >> In article <1kgub4y3t06z1$.17crzt6zp3873$.dlg(a)40tude.net>, >> richard <member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: >> >>> FYI, green cards never came with citizenship. Citizenship comes by earning >>> it. >>> Birthing laws have been changed so that illegal alien children can no >>> longer become a natural citizen just because they were born in the states. >> Cite please? I was under the impression that that was a constitutional >> right and can't be changed as passing laws like that can get overturned >> by the supreme court? > > cite to which? > Green cards are not handed out just because you want one. They give you the > legal right to work. They sure as hell are not a guranteed "right". > > It used to be that a foreigner could gain citizenship simply by marriage. > That was changed back in the 70's becauset they found several soldiers who > had married two or three vietnamese women while on tour. Each time they > came to the states, they got a divorce, she got her papers. > > Do your own research. Educate yourself. What she was asking for some proof of was the claim that someone born in the US is not a citizen if his parents were here illegally. Since this violates the 14th Amendment, I doubt the law were changed. And, since you changed the argument to spouses getting citizenship, I am guessing you also know it was an incorrect statement. This debating technique makes me think you deliberately lied, but I am willing to give the benefit of the doubt for one answer and assume you made an honest mistake. Steve Rothstein
From: The Daring Dufas on 2 May 2010 15:12 Stephan Rothstein wrote: > richard wrote: >> On Sun, 02 May 2010 09:54:53 -0500, Omelet wrote: >> >>> In article <1kgub4y3t06z1$.17crzt6zp3873$.dlg(a)40tude.net>, >>> richard <member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: >>> >>>> FYI, green cards never came with citizenship. Citizenship comes by >>>> earning >>>> it. >>>> Birthing laws have been changed so that illegal alien children can no >>>> longer become a natural citizen just because they were born in the >>>> states. >>> Cite please? I was under the impression that that was a >>> constitutional right and can't be changed as passing laws like that >>> can get overturned by the supreme court? >> >> cite to which? >> Green cards are not handed out just because you want one. They give >> you the >> legal right to work. They sure as hell are not a guranteed "right". >> >> It used to be that a foreigner could gain citizenship simply by marriage. >> That was changed back in the 70's becauset they found several soldiers >> who >> had married two or three vietnamese women while on tour. Each time they >> came to the states, they got a divorce, she got her papers. >> >> Do your own research. Educate yourself. > > What she was asking for some proof of was the claim that someone born in > the US is not a citizen if his parents were here illegally. Since this > violates the 14th Amendment, I doubt the law were changed. > > And, since you changed the argument to spouses getting citizenship, I am > guessing you also know it was an incorrect statement. This debating > technique makes me think you deliberately lied, but I am willing to give > the benefit of the doubt for one answer and assume you made an honest > mistake. > > Steve Rothstein I believe I read something about the Canadian government changing the law of birthright citizenship there in Canada because it had become such a huge problem for them. I'm glad that it's very difficult for The United States government to LEGALLY take away a Constitutionally guaranteed right. What I would like to see is a simple change for now that I think a court could twist some bloomers over would be to rule that a child has to be conceived within the borders of The U.S. before being considered a citizen except those newborns of existing citizens. That would cause wetbacks to howl "NO FAIR HOMES!" quite loudly. TDD
From: HeyBub on 2 May 2010 15:41
climber wrote: > On May 1, 3:38 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers Are Murderers" > <threeb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> Bammer is a traitor and is totally controlled by Big Business and >> they love illegals and those $4 wages with no benefits. > > Does anyone support that miserable collection of swine called Congress > and the > Executive? America needs a total breakdown and rebuild. > > climber > > of interest: > > http://www.stormfront.org/ Stormfront (fine forums) > > http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/ Vanguard News Network Thank you for spreading your insane views to groups not directed by the original poster. What forces you to hold that sensible people on alt.gossip.celebrities or tx.guns gives a fig about your paranoia? We've got enough of our own to deal with. If you MUST cross-post, please do so to alt.test. |