James May on panda crossings
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: The_day_I_hit_a_child_at_20mph_-_and_realised_the_ speed_limit_must_be_cut
Next: Well done that driver!
From: Squashme on 2 Jun 2010 03:45 On 1 June, 10:22, ChelseaTractorMan <mr.c.trac...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 01:42:51 -0700 (PDT), Squashme <squas...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >Pedestrians could buy them > > pedestrians are usually the same people as drivers and passengers. > -- Really?! I thought that I noticed similarities in their unobservant distracted fuckwittery. That would explain it. Couldn't be cyclists, because when they walk they float beatifically several inches above the ground.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on 2 Jun 2010 04:16 On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:45:48 -0700 (PDT), Squashme <squashme(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> pedestrians are usually the same people as drivers and passengers. >> -- > >Really?! I thought that I noticed similarities in their unobservant >distracted fuckwittery. That would explain it. indeed, people are like that. >Couldn't be cyclists, because when they walk they float beatifically >several inches above the ground. well you see, they are non polluting, so therefore perfection. -- Mike. .. . Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: Squashme on 2 Jun 2010 07:12 On 2 June, 09:16, ChelseaTractorMan <mr.c.trac...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:45:48 -0700 (PDT), Squashme <squas...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> pedestrians are usually the same people as drivers and passengers. > >> -- > > >Really?! I thought that I noticed similarities in their unobservant > >distracted fuckwittery. That would explain it. > > indeed, people are like that. That being so, why are so many allowed to drive potentially lethal machines? I mean I know that they are protected largely from the consequences of their own fuckwittery, but some of us are outside the defence perimeter and rather squishy and scrapy, not to say scrunchy. Never mind, I am sure that compulsory cycle training and testing will enable me to foresee and dodge all their foolishness. Ummmm. > > >Couldn't be cyclists, because when they walk they float beatifically > >several inches above the ground. > > well you see, they are non polluting, so therefore perfection. > -- Very few ancient sea creatures were harmed in the production of my steed, and no Bambis whatever. However, I suspect that quite a few Chinese workers were oppressed, but perhaps, as Mao never said, "A rising tide raises all boats."
From: ChelseaTractorMan on 2 Jun 2010 08:14 On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 04:12:58 -0700 (PDT), Squashme <squashme(a)gmail.com> wrote: > but some of us are outside the >defence perimeter and rather squishy and scrapy, not to say scrunchy. >Never mind, I am sure that compulsory cycle training and testing will >enable me to foresee and dodge all their foolishness. Ummmm. it would help with some of the idiotic things I see, like youfs riding at night without lights. But for the general point of vulnerability, 44 tonne lorries and cycles do not mix and never will, we need the trucks for the foreseeable future so you will not find me cycling anywhere near them. I lost one colleague to the classic trapped on the left of a big truck accident, it's not going to happen to me. -- Mike. .. . Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on 3 Jun 2010 05:16
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:11:48 +0100, ChelseaTractorMan <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >>Sorry, not attacking you and your life either. Just putting the >>devil's case. > >understood. (feel free to carry on, I'm frustrated by my long term car hater elsewhere killfiling me because he didnt like the arguments (especially about his heavy use of air transport) its nice to get back on the old anti car scenario :-) ) -- Mike. .. . Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine. |