From: OzOne on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:20:32 GMT, "George W Frost"
<georgewfrost(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>No prize for second
>

Tailend Charlie crawls in.




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: Toby on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:19:57 +1000, OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:05:25 +1000, Toby <me(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>So, does she?
>
> Yes.(unfortunately)
>
>
>
>
> OzOne of the three twins
>
> I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.

Bloody hell!

--

Toby
From: OzOne on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:13:43 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote:

>
><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
>news:q46c16l0qihiohgj3d1dvhuf2ivg8a14ln(a)4ax.com...
>
>> OK so now you've failed to delineate two points and throw in
>> another...
>
>On the contrary.

Sorry...You've failed on two counts
>
>You're turning what is a reasonably serious issue where the taxpayer is
>burdoned to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars by someone off on a
>personal pleasure quest into a game of trivial nonsense.
>
>> so I'll ask, where do you draw the line in equipment and
>> cost for a rescue....obviously somewhere between a 737 and a ride in a
>> police car home....
>
>I draw the line at *stupidity* as it often knows no boundaries.
>



Hmmmm, So when my arthritic,demented MIL, who has moments of lucidity
decides that she can walk to the shop and find her way home, that is
patently stupid and she should not be rescued.




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: Noddy on

<OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
news:d17c16lkmpjpd04ba2g8ml55ka7at9kl4a(a)4ax.com...

> Did you notice the word "fundraising"

I did indeed.

How much did *you* kick in out of your own pocket? Paying them back with
other people's money doesn't really cut the mustard.

--
Regards,
Noddy.


From: Noddy on

<OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
news:j47c16hskb5mdflovhsghb6fnl4fi87il3(a)4ax.com...

> Please post proof that AMSA are not pleased to do rescues because of
> the training value.

Sorry Ozliar, but it's *your* assertion that they are. *You* get to prove
it.

--
Regards,
Noddy.