Just a walk in the park.
in [Aussie Drivers]
|
From: OzOne on 17 Jun 2010 22:11 On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:31:54 +1000, jonz <fj40(a)deisel.com> wrote: >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Murphys law :- Never argue with a fool people might not know the >difference...................... Yep...When you talk they start dancing :) OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 17 Jun 2010 22:14 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:59:33 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: > >"Milton" <millame23(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:4c1a8702$0$14127$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > >> That's not Murphy's Law! > >No, it's Jonz law, which can translate into anything you like. Anything like Noddy's Law.... "I'm right until you prove I'm wrong.. I don't accept proof of anything." OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 17 Jun 2010 22:15 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:10:46 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: >Actually it's lucky him. The people who have to live near you are the >unlucky ones. Funny...I'd have thought all the people in my area consider themselves quite fortunate. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 17 Jun 2010 22:16 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:22:58 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: >Of course, you being a fuckwit, would never appreciate that. And you being a fuckwit can't see it any other way. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 17 Jun 2010 22:29
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:45:50 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote: >On 15/06/2010 8:31 AM, OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:43:00 +1000, Sylvia Else >> <sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote: >> >> >>>> You don't seem to understand that responsibilities are shared. >>> >>> You can leave out comments about what I do or do not understand. They >>> are not relevant to the debate. >> >> I'd be leaving out a lot.... > >That seems to be an admission that you make a lot of irrelevant comments >about what you think I do or do not understand. You include them because >doing so makes you feel good, and you probably think they make you look >good. Since they don't advance the debate, they're just an indulgence. >By all means leave them out. Actually Sylvia...It's a comment on you understanding so little. Though I do agree somewhat with your comment on the Canley Vale thread. He hopefully had no option than to continue rather than crash land in a park or paddock...a suburban street at 8am is a bad choice in an aircraft with a full load of fuel, a stall of 65kts a 12metre wingspan and no power. Maybe he was trying at the last second for the paddock behind the school...we will never know. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. |