From: OzOne on
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:55:07 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote:

>
><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
>news:klkl16ph160abj2ebkef5u5512pgddg4ef(a)4ax.com...
>
>> She's 89 and so gets free ambulance.....The public pays for her
>> 'rescue'
>
>They shouldn't have to.

Better talk to your politician then....
>
>> Should they not pay because in your opinion she's stupid and doesn't
>> deserve the help?
>
>No, they shouldn't.

Ahhh so she should be left sitting on a park bench.....Or should they
sell her house and throw her on the streets to pay the cost?
>
>If she's beyond caring for herself, then she needs to either be looked after
>by someone who is capable (and it sounds like she's not) or placed into a
>care facility.

Ahhhh I see...just lock her away.
Do you think a trained carer is not capable because my MIL chooses 3am
to take a walk to the shop to get some milk?
>
>> Yeah....I'm the one who pays a full time carer to live with
>> her...unfortunately that carer needs to bathe and sleep and chaining
>> my MIL up during those time is apparently not legal, Fool.
>
>Why not just put her into a proper care facility and be done with it?

Because she's far better off at home...




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:56:02 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote:

>
><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
>news:j6ll16pnq0lsnlghps020anukscuetc2es(a)4ax.com...
>
>> No, I contributed my valuable time...and didn't get a tax deduction.
>
>Yeah, I thought doing anything *other* than cracking open your wallet might
>be your scene :)

Yeah, maybe I could have charged for my time....and declared it as
income.




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:57:13 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote:

>
><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
>news:6gll16lfbhf2qoac8o518gqvu0nhgdtoi0(a)4ax.com...
>
>> "I'm right until you prove I'm wrong.. I don't accept proof of
>> anything."
>
>Which doesn't apply in your case, as you never offer up proof. Ever.


I've proven you wrong on many occasions




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:42:02 +1000, Sylvia Else
<sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote:

>On 18/06/2010 12:29 PM, OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:45:50 +1000, Sylvia Else
>> <sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 15/06/2010 8:31 AM, OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:43:00 +1000, Sylvia Else
>>>> <sylvia(a)not.here.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> You don't seem to understand that responsibilities are shared.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can leave out comments about what I do or do not understand. They
>>>>> are not relevant to the debate.
>>>>
>>>> I'd be leaving out a lot....
>>>
>>> That seems to be an admission that you make a lot of irrelevant comments
>>> about what you think I do or do not understand. You include them because
>>> doing so makes you feel good, and you probably think they make you look
>>> good. Since they don't advance the debate, they're just an indulgence.
>>> By all means leave them out.
>>
>> Actually Sylvia...It's a comment on you understanding so little.
>
>You could conside the possibility that having a different perspective is
>not the same as not understanding something. Many decisions involve
>value judgements. Many people seem unable to recognise that they're even
>making these judgements, and as a result conclude that those who weigh
>values differently are necessarily wrong.
>
>Sylvia.

That Sylvia is and indicator...I said nothing about your perspective
nor about you being wrong.




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:08:36 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote:

>
><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
>news:ibsl1695tap1tt9mirf9sikbqgba7o3ojq(a)4ax.com...
>
>> Yeah, denial ain't a river....
>
>Feel free to quote any comments from the original thread Ozliar.
>
>Oh, that's right, you "can't be bothered", can you? :)

No Nod I can't be bothered.....Why would I spend hours probing the
Phosphoric acid thread (the one you were shown to be wrong in) for one
of your diversions only to have you tell me I'm wrong......but not
need to prove that.

Geddit!?




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.