Justice at last
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: bugbear on 15 Apr 2010 04:54 Adrian wrote: > Compared to a hypothetical one who'd easily be banned for that little > lot... Those hypothetical motorists are a damned menace. BugBear
From: Dave Plowman on 15 Apr 2010 05:05 In article <fdjds59f208jt3uect4f0b29p6q77bdj4g(a)4ax.com>, Tom Crispin <kije.remove(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:57:15 +0100, Bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> > wrote: > > A car driver would quite possibly be incarcerated even, for driving > >on the pavement! > Really! I regularly see cars that have clearly been driven on the > pavement, yet the police seem to ignore this offence which you claim > in serious enough to warrant a prison sentence. You must have very wide pavements round your way. Are you getting confused? They're usually either side of the roadway. -- *A backward poet writes inverse* Dave Plowman dave(a)davesound.co.uk London SW 12
From: Adrian on 15 Apr 2010 05:32 "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> But, meanwhile, so that we know we're looking at comparable events, >> when did you last see any car driver intentionally drive along the >> pavement for a significant proportion of their journey? > <Scratches head> Can't say I have guv. No, nor me. > But I was defending the never-and-always type of arguments. I must've missed those.
From: boltar2003 on 15 Apr 2010 05:35 On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:28:12 +0100 "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >Err, they do, you can see it almost daily. People drving across the pavement to park in their driveways doesn't count. B2003
From: mileburner on 15 Apr 2010 05:39
"Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:82o4ooFr1hU4(a)mid.individual.net... > "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> gurgled happily, sounding much > like they were saying: > >>> But, meanwhile, so that we know we're looking at comparable events, >>> when did you last see any car driver intentionally drive along the >>> pavement for a significant proportion of their journey? > >> <Scratches head> Can't say I have guv. > > No, nor me. > >> But I was defending the never-and-always type of arguments. > > I must've missed those. It goes along the lines of: cyclists always ride on the pavement, jump red lights ride without lights, ignore the law etc. and drivers never do those things. Both are of course quite untrue. |