Justice at last
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Dr Zoidberg on 15 Apr 2010 02:35 "McKevvy" <vicko_zoomba(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:78c6f8c1-0bfc-4b10-850f-ef3924a55a2f(a)i25g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On 15 Apr, 01:04, "The Medway Handyman" <davidl...(a)no-spam- > blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > <waits for Dougs response> > > McK > <waits for Dougs response> This may take some time -- Alex
From: Adrian on 15 Apr 2010 02:37 "Dr Zoidberg" <AlexNOOOOO!!!!!!@drzoidberg.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> <waits for Dougs response> >> >> McK >> <waits for Dougs response> > This may take some time Nah, won't be long. After all, he's busy posting in other threads and starting new ones, so he'll surely post a reasoned response in this one...
From: Ret. on 15 Apr 2010 03:06 Dr Zoidberg wrote: > "McKevvy" <vicko_zoomba(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:78c6f8c1-0bfc-4b10-850f-ef3924a55a2f(a)i25g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> On 15 Apr, 01:04, "The Medway Handyman" <davidl...(a)no-spam- >> blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >> <waits for Dougs response> >> >> McK >> <waits for Dougs response> > > This may take some time Doug recently posted on uk.legal, praising the Thai authorities for the peaceful way they 'police' protests compared to the UK situation. I told him he would be left with egg on his face when the inevitable happened. It has of course: "Pressure is mounting on Thailand's Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva, days after 21 people died in clashes between troops and anti-government protesters. Saturday's clashes were the deadliest political violence since 1992. Seventeen civilians died in the unrest - including a Japanese cameraman working for Reuters news agency. At least four soldiers were also killed and 800 other people were injured." I drew this to Doug's attention and asked for his comments but, of course, he has failed to respond... Kev
From: Adrian on 15 Apr 2010 03:48 Squashme <squashme(a)gmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> > Brighton cyclist fined £700 for going through a red light. >> It gets better! >> >> He was also convicted of cycling without lights, cycling on the >> pavement and failing to stop for police. He got off lightly compared >> to a motorist. > Compared to which motorist? Compared to a hypothetical one who'd easily be banned for that little lot...
From: Bod on 15 Apr 2010 03:57
On 15/04/2010 08:48, Adrian wrote: > Squashme<squashme(a)gmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they > were saying: > >>>> Brighton cyclist fined £700 for going through a red light. > >>> It gets better! >>> >>> He was also convicted of cycling without lights, cycling on the >>> pavement and failing to stop for police. He got off lightly compared >>> to a motorist. > >> Compared to which motorist? > > Compared to a hypothetical one who'd easily be banned for that little > lot... > > A car driver would quite possibly be incarcerated even, for driving on the pavement! Bod |