From: Brimstone on 22 Mar 2010 10:57 "Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:80pb18Fjn6U31(a)mid.individual.net... > "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like > they were saying: > >>>> Is it brewed according to the Reinheitsgebot? > >>> According to their advertising, yes. > >> Link? > > http://www.inbev.co.uk/Becks.htm > "To this day Beck's is brewed in strict accordance to the Reinheitsgebot > German purity law." So what makes you think, objectively, that Becks is poor quality? I'm prepared to accept that you don't like it, but that's a personal opinion.
From: Adrian on 22 Mar 2010 11:23 "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>>>> Is it brewed according to the Reinheitsgebot? >>>> According to their advertising, yes. >>> Link? >> http://www.inbev.co.uk/Becks.htm >> "To this day Beck's is brewed in strict accordance to the >> Reinheitsgebot German purity law." > So what makes you think, objectively, that Becks is poor quality? I'm > prepared to accept that you don't like it, but that's a personal > opinion. I didn't say it was poor quality. I said it was "Generic EuroFizz". I'm sure all of the bland generic heavily-marketed chemical rubbish meets high production quality standards. Even Fosters.
From: Brimstone on 22 Mar 2010 11:55 "Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:80pgb0Fjn6U38(a)mid.individual.net... > "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like > they were saying: > >>>>>> Is it brewed according to the Reinheitsgebot? > >>>>> According to their advertising, yes. > >>>> Link? > >>> http://www.inbev.co.uk/Becks.htm >>> "To this day Beck's is brewed in strict accordance to the >>> Reinheitsgebot German purity law." > >> So what makes you think, objectively, that Becks is poor quality? I'm >> prepared to accept that you don't like it, but that's a personal >> opinion. > > I didn't say it was poor quality. I said it was "Generic EuroFizz". > > I'm sure all of the bland generic heavily-marketed chemical rubbish meets > high production quality standards. Even Fosters. If it's produced under the Reinheitsgebot how can it be "chemical rubbish"? I'd be interested to know what is meant by "chemical rubbish".
From: Adrian on 22 Mar 2010 12:00 "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>>>>>> Is it brewed according to the Reinheitsgebot? >>>>>> According to their advertising, yes. >>>>> Link? >>>> http://www.inbev.co.uk/Becks.htm >>>> "To this day Beck's is brewed in strict accordance to the >>>> Reinheitsgebot German purity law." >>> So what makes you think, objectively, that Becks is poor quality? I'm >>> prepared to accept that you don't like it, but that's a personal >>> opinion. >> I didn't say it was poor quality. I said it was "Generic EuroFizz". >> >> I'm sure all of the bland generic heavily-marketed chemical rubbish >> meets high production quality standards. Even Fosters. > If it's produced under the Reinheitsgebot how can it be "chemical > rubbish"? Did I say I was including Becks in that? I did not. I was merely pointing out that "quality" was a very loose term that means nothing. Even Kwik-Fit shout loudly that they meet quality standards.
From: Brimstone on 22 Mar 2010 12:04
"Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:80pih2Fjn6U40(a)mid.individual.net... > "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like > they were saying: > >>>>>>>> Is it brewed according to the Reinheitsgebot? > >>>>>>> According to their advertising, yes. > >>>>>> Link? > >>>>> http://www.inbev.co.uk/Becks.htm >>>>> "To this day Beck's is brewed in strict accordance to the >>>>> Reinheitsgebot German purity law." > >>>> So what makes you think, objectively, that Becks is poor quality? I'm >>>> prepared to accept that you don't like it, but that's a personal >>>> opinion. > >>> I didn't say it was poor quality. I said it was "Generic EuroFizz". >>> >>> I'm sure all of the bland generic heavily-marketed chemical rubbish >>> meets high production quality standards. Even Fosters. > >> If it's produced under the Reinheitsgebot how can it be "chemical >> rubbish"? > > Did I say I was including Becks in that? I did not. I was merely pointing > out that "quality" was a very loose term that means nothing. > > Even Kwik-Fit shout loudly that they meet quality standards. Since you've had to wriggle I declare a win. |