M6 motorway speeds?
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Adrian on 30 Jun 2010 06:39 bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>>>> You're comparison is innapropriate. One is blatant theft and the >>>>> other is pushing the limits of the law. >>>> No, they're both illegal. End of story. >>> Only if applying the *strict* letter of the law....then yes. >> What other kind is there? > Common sense Mmm. Don't think that'll get you very far in a full & frank exchange of views with the Dibble, do you? > unless you yourself think that the letter of the law MUST be obeyed, no > matter what. No, but Kev is arguing precisely that - whilst doing something completely different. Something can't be a "little bit illegal". It's like being a little bit pregnant.
From: Adrian on 30 Jun 2010 06:40 bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>>> Kev wishes we were all just like him. Remember how quickly he turned >>>> on you when football started to be discussed? >>> Yes I remember ....and that is narrow minded. >> Purely that particular one, and purely because it was aimed at >> something you enjoy doing? Or do you accept that many of his views are >> generally narrow-minded? > Yes Good-oh. > on some issues. Was that the start of a wiggle? Or is it only the blinkers you don't agree with which you count as narrow-minded?
From: bod on 30 Jun 2010 06:51 Adrian wrote: > bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > saying: > >>>>> Kev wishes we were all just like him. Remember how quickly he turned >>>>> on you when football started to be discussed? > >>>> Yes I remember ....and that is narrow minded. > >>> Purely that particular one, and purely because it was aimed at >>> something you enjoy doing? Or do you accept that many of his views are >>> generally narrow-minded? > >> Yes > > Good-oh. > >> on some issues. > > Was that the start of a wiggle? Or is it only the blinkers you don't > agree with which you count as narrow-minded? > > Like I said, narrow minded, or entrenched opinions, on some issues. Bod
From: Adrian on 30 Jun 2010 06:59 bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>>> Or do you accept that many of his views are generally narrow-minded? >>> Yes >> Good-oh. >>> on some issues. >> Was that the start of a wiggle? Or is it only the blinkers you don't >> agree with which you count as narrow-minded? > Like I said, narrow minded, or entrenched opinions, on some issues. We are in complete agreement, then. Welcome.
From: Mike P on 30 Jun 2010 07:02
On 30 June, 11:59, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > bod <bodro...(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > saying: > > >>>> Or do you accept that many of his views are generally narrow-minded? > >>> Yes > >> Good-oh. > >>> on some issues. > >> Was that the start of a wiggle? Or is it only the blinkers you don't > >> agree with which you count as narrow-minded? > > Like I said, narrow minded, or entrenched opinions, on some issues. > > We are in complete agreement, then. Welcome. I wonder if Bod thinks women going out to work are the cause of all affairs as Kev does on the other group thread.. Mike P |