From: Adrian on
Mike P <max.cat(a)hotmail.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:

>> >   Like I said, narrow minded, or entrenched opinions, on some
>> >   issues.

>> We are in complete agreement, then. Welcome.

> I wonder if Bod thinks women going out to work are the cause of all
> affairs as Kev does on the other group thread..

Not all, to be fair.

Just most.
From: Mike P on
On 30 June, 11:59, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> bod <bodro...(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> saying:
>
> >>>> Or do you accept that many of his views are generally narrow-minded?
> >>>   Yes
> >> Good-oh.
> >>> on some issues.
> >> Was that the start of a wiggle? Or is it only the blinkers you don't
> >> agree with which you count as narrow-minded?
> >   Like I said, narrow minded, or entrenched opinions, on some issues.
>
> We are in complete agreement, then. Welcome.

I wonder if Bod thinks women going out to work are the cause of all
affairs as Kev does on the other group thread..

Mike P
From: Adrian on
bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

>> If he's obvlivious to anyone else, how do you know he's not going to
>> sideswipe you if you go past on the left?

> I went passed him veeerrryyy slowly.

Eh? You're mad. That increases the likelihood of him hitting you - I'd
have made sure I spent as little time as possible in the danger zone next
to him.

I'd also have just done it, hang whether it's legal or not. If I got a
tug, then it'd be my own bloody silly fault for not spotting the plod.
From: Mike P on
On 30 June, 12:10, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> bod <bodro...(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> saying:
>
> >> If he's obvlivious to anyone else, how do you know he's not going to
> >> sideswipe you if you go past on the left?
> >   I went passed him veeerrryyy slowly.
>
> Eh? You're mad. That increases the likelihood of him hitting you - I'd
> have made sure I spent as little time as possible in the danger zone next
> to him.
>
> I'd also have just done it, hang whether it's legal or not. If I got a
> tug, then it'd be my own bloody silly fault for not spotting the plod.

Well, quite..

Mike P
From: bod on
Mike P wrote:
> On 30 June, 11:59, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> bod <bodro...(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
>> saying:
>>
>>>>>> Or do you accept that many of his views are generally narrow-minded?
>>>>> Yes
>>>> Good-oh.
>>>>> on some issues.
>>>> Was that the start of a wiggle? Or is it only the blinkers you don't
>>>> agree with which you count as narrow-minded?
>>> Like I said, narrow minded, or entrenched opinions, on some issues.
>> We are in complete agreement, then. Welcome.
>
> I wonder if Bod thinks women going out to work are the cause of all
> affairs as Kev does on the other group thread..
>
> Mike P
>
>

Of course not.

Bod