From: Adrian on 30 Jun 2010 07:03 Mike P <max.cat(a)hotmail.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> > Like I said, narrow minded, or entrenched opinions, on some >> > issues. >> We are in complete agreement, then. Welcome. > I wonder if Bod thinks women going out to work are the cause of all > affairs as Kev does on the other group thread.. Not all, to be fair. Just most.
From: Mike P on 30 Jun 2010 07:09 On 30 June, 11:59, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > bod <bodro...(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > saying: > > >>>> Or do you accept that many of his views are generally narrow-minded? > >>> Yes > >> Good-oh. > >>> on some issues. > >> Was that the start of a wiggle? Or is it only the blinkers you don't > >> agree with which you count as narrow-minded? > > Like I said, narrow minded, or entrenched opinions, on some issues. > > We are in complete agreement, then. Welcome. I wonder if Bod thinks women going out to work are the cause of all affairs as Kev does on the other group thread.. Mike P
From: Adrian on 30 Jun 2010 07:10 bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> If he's obvlivious to anyone else, how do you know he's not going to >> sideswipe you if you go past on the left? > I went passed him veeerrryyy slowly. Eh? You're mad. That increases the likelihood of him hitting you - I'd have made sure I spent as little time as possible in the danger zone next to him. I'd also have just done it, hang whether it's legal or not. If I got a tug, then it'd be my own bloody silly fault for not spotting the plod.
From: Mike P on 30 Jun 2010 07:11 On 30 June, 12:10, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > bod <bodro...(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > saying: > > >> If he's obvlivious to anyone else, how do you know he's not going to > >> sideswipe you if you go past on the left? > > I went passed him veeerrryyy slowly. > > Eh? You're mad. That increases the likelihood of him hitting you - I'd > have made sure I spent as little time as possible in the danger zone next > to him. > > I'd also have just done it, hang whether it's legal or not. If I got a > tug, then it'd be my own bloody silly fault for not spotting the plod. Well, quite.. Mike P
From: bod on 30 Jun 2010 07:12
Mike P wrote: > On 30 June, 11:59, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> bod <bodro...(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were >> saying: >> >>>>>> Or do you accept that many of his views are generally narrow-minded? >>>>> Yes >>>> Good-oh. >>>>> on some issues. >>>> Was that the start of a wiggle? Or is it only the blinkers you don't >>>> agree with which you count as narrow-minded? >>> Like I said, narrow minded, or entrenched opinions, on some issues. >> We are in complete agreement, then. Welcome. > > I wonder if Bod thinks women going out to work are the cause of all > affairs as Kev does on the other group thread.. > > Mike P > > Of course not. Bod |