From: bod on
Mike P wrote:
> On 30 June, 12:18, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> bod <bodro...(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
>> saying:
>>
>>>> I wouldn't have been dim enough to do an illegal undertake in front of
>>>> a police car, whatever I did.
>>>> I'd have hoped that plod might have pulled him over ...
>>> It was an unmarked car in heavy traffic and several cars back.
>>> Are you Superman, with Xray vision?
>> I find it _very_ difficult to believe that TrafPlod in an unmarked would
>> stop YOU in that situation, unless he believed that your manouvre was so
>> badly executed as to increase the danger.
>
> I got stopped by an unmarked once. I overtook them in a 2CV.
>
> I wasn't actually breaking the limit, but they told me I looked like I
> was "about to roll over and should slow down..."
>
> Mike P
>
>

Hmm, is it possible to speed in a 2CV? :)

Bod
From: Mike P on
On 30 June, 12:32, bod <bodro...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> Mike P wrote:
> > On 30 June, 12:18, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> bod <bodro...(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> >> saying:
>
> >>>> I wouldn't have been dim enough to do an illegal undertake in front of
> >>>> a police car, whatever I did.
> >>>> I'd have hoped that plod might have pulled him over ...
> >>>   It was an unmarked car in heavy traffic and several cars back.
> >>> Are you Superman, with Xray vision?
> >> I find it _very_ difficult to believe that TrafPlod in an unmarked would
> >> stop YOU in that situation, unless he believed that your manouvre was so
> >> badly executed as to increase the danger.
>
> > I got stopped by an unmarked once. I overtook them in a 2CV.
>
> > I wasn't actually breaking the limit, but they told me I looked like I
> > was "about to roll over and should slow down..."
>
> > Mike P

>   Hmm, is it possible to speed in a 2CV? :)

I've driven a totally standard 2CV from Rawtenstall to Marlow in
2h45mins.

Mike P

From: Adrian on
Mike P <mikewpearson1(a)gmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:

> You can, if you are , say , on a motorway or a 3-lane A-road (like the
> A4 going into London) where all three lanes are moving at similar, but
> slow speeds.

On the one hand, HC163
On the other hand, HC160, HC168, HC169.
From: Adrian on
bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

>> I got stopped by an unmarked once. I overtook them in a 2CV.
>>
>> I wasn't actually breaking the limit, but they told me I looked like I
>> was "about to roll over and should slow down..."

> Hmm, is it possible to speed in a 2CV? :)

Oh, yes...
From: Ret. on
Adrian wrote:
> bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
> were saying:
>
>> Doesn't detract from the fact, that you did get done and Kev hasn't.
>
> Which doesn't detract from the fact that that's got nothing to do with
> safe use of speed appropriate for the conditions.

So you accept that speed in itself has nothing to do with road safety? Then
how can you claim that I am driving dangerously (when I am patently not).

--
Kev