Prev: IF PRESIDENT REV. WRIGHT WAS CAUGHT ON TAPE MURDERING BABIES MOST BLACKS WITH STILL SUPPORT HIM
Next: An oversight? sure it was.
From: T.J. Higgins on 8 Apr 2010 11:22 In article <gcorr5p9e3rk1ppfqr2cr4e0q5fogn2nbi(a)4ax.com>, Scott in SoCal wrote: >Right now 3 terminals at LAX are shut down and hudreds of passengers >are standing outside because of a security breach. This was because >some MFFY ditched the secondary screening; the TSA selected him for a >wanding, but instead he grabbed his bags and ran. As a result they >completely evacuated 3 terminals, delayd hundreds of people for >several hours, and fucked up connecting flights all over the country. >All because one MFFY was [too important | in too much of a hurry] for >a pat-down. > >I wonder how many cars he cut off on his way to the airport? On the bright side, he'll be inconvenienced by court dates and possibly some jail time. -- TJH tjhiggin.at.hiwaay.dot.net
From: Brent on 8 Apr 2010 12:06 On 2010-04-08, Scott in SoCal <scottenaztlan(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Right now 3 terminals at LAX are shut down and hudreds of passengers > are standing outside because of a security breach. This was because > some MFFY ditched the secondary screening; the TSA selected him for a > wanding, but instead he grabbed his bags and ran. As a result they > completely evacuated 3 terminals, delayd hundreds of people for > several hours, and fucked up connecting flights all over the country. > All because one MFFY was [too important | in too much of a hurry] for > a pat-down. Um, do you feel the same about avoiding police check points when driving? Is that MFFY to you as well?
From: richard on 8 Apr 2010 13:53 On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:08:52 -0700, Scott in SoCal wrote: > Right now 3 terminals at LAX are shut down and hudreds of passengers > are standing outside because of a security breach. This was because > some MFFY ditched the secondary screening; the TSA selected him for a > wanding, but instead he grabbed his bags and ran. As a result they > completely evacuated 3 terminals, delayd hundreds of people for > several hours, and fucked up connecting flights all over the country. > All because one MFFY was [too important | in too much of a hurry] for > a pat-down. > > I wonder how many cars he cut off on his way to the airport? http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-lax-denver-bomb-scare,0,2768946.story He was probably pissed off at the procedure. I was with my first TSA experience. Upon entering the Salt Lake airport, NOTHING is said anywhere about what is allowed on the plane. You were not told a damn thing until you got into line for the screening. Without question, they took 3 valuable zippo lighters even though neither had any fuel. When I dared to challenge, the supervisor came over and told me, "Yes sir you can have them back and we'll escort you off the property.". IOW, TSA has the legal right to steal your property and you have no way of getting it back, ever. They don't even offer a claim receipt. So if the agent wants to keep YOUR property, he can. Legally.
From: Brent on 8 Apr 2010 14:59 On 2010-04-08, N8N <njnagel(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 8, 1:48�pm, gpsman <gps...(a)driversmail.com> wrote: >> 2. The evidence suggests airport security is not useless. > Ah, there you go, having that pesky little problem with those things > called "facts" again. Can you cite even one instance where TSA > screening has detected a credible threat before the miscreant boarded > the airplane? Gpstroll is always going to agree with the government. I do believe him when he said he was in the empire's legions for numerous years. He demonstrates that 'following orders' mindless stupidity over and over again. If gpstroll were still in the military he'd likely gleefully run internal checkpoints demanding to see our papers and stealing our stuff in the name of "security". >> > but I doubt >> > that there's a single traveler that deep down inside doesn't think >> > about doing the same thing. >> You're wrong, of course. �Obviously and irrefutably Bullisesquely >> wrong. > No, you're wrong, and stupid. There are a few travellers who like the TSA. They are control freaks who think they are part of the system. (like gpstroll) They'll learn they aren't part of the system sooner or later when suddenly they find themselves on the recieving end of laws, procedures, and/or policies that they believed would only be used on 'bad' people.
From: T.J. Higgins on 8 Apr 2010 15:32
In article <hpl92j$jsm$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Brent wrote: >There are a few travellers who like the TSA. They are control freaks who >think they are part of the system. (like gpstroll) They'll learn they >aren't part of the system sooner or later when suddenly they find >themselves on the recieving end of laws, procedures, and/or policies >that they believed would only be used on 'bad' people. I've posted this before, but it seems relevant here: "Give government the weapons to fight your enemy and it will use them against you." -- Harry Browne -- TJH tjhiggin.at.hiwaay.dot.net |