From: ChelseaTractorMan on 20 Apr 2010 02:41 On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:51:17 +0100, Hugo Nebula <abuse(a)localhost> wrote: >>the lesson learned was not to expect some people to make a sensible >>analysis. > >How to drive - day one, lesson one: Everyone else on the road is about >to do something idiotic; plan accordingly. I agree, but in this case I was talking about Mr Bitsy and usenet. The thread was supposed to be about dealing with such things. -- Mike. .. . Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on 20 Apr 2010 02:41 On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:50:35 +0100, MrBitsy <ray.keattch(a)infinity.com> wrote: >I get it now, you do not believe it is possible to anticipate. your whole approach to this thread is childish -- Mike. .. . Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on 20 Apr 2010 02:42 On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:53:25 +0100, MrBitsy <ray.keattch(a)infinity.com> wrote: >> The problem is you had a need to prove me wrong in some way when I >> reported bad driving in somebody else, its a childish trait here. >> >I have never said you was wrong !!!!!!!!!!!! -- Mike. .. . Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on 20 Apr 2010 02:42 On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:36:37 +0100, Harry Bloomfield <harry.m1byt(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote: >As I read the account, all the signs WERE there for him to go left - >there was a 1 in ? chance of him going right. ? meaning a slightly >increased chance to what I would consider a normal risk. pretty much it. -- Mike. .. . Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on 20 Apr 2010 02:43
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:03:27 +0100, MrBitsy <ray.keattch(a)infinity.com> wrote: >You surprise me - a car going unusually slowly at a turn off should be >getting a bit more attention than normal. It was. That's why I didn't let it hit me. You have made stuff up right through this thread. -- Mike. .. . Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine. |