From: ChelseaTractorMan on
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:51:17 +0100, Hugo Nebula <abuse(a)localhost>
wrote:

>>the lesson learned was not to expect some people to make a sensible
>>analysis.
>
>How to drive - day one, lesson one: Everyone else on the road is about
>to do something idiotic; plan accordingly.

I agree, but in this case I was talking about Mr Bitsy and usenet. The
thread was supposed to be about dealing with such things.
--
Mike. .. .
Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:50:35 +0100, MrBitsy <ray.keattch(a)infinity.com>
wrote:

>I get it now, you do not believe it is possible to anticipate.

your whole approach to this thread is childish
--
Mike. .. .
Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:53:25 +0100, MrBitsy <ray.keattch(a)infinity.com>
wrote:

>> The problem is you had a need to prove me wrong in some way when I
>> reported bad driving in somebody else, its a childish trait here.
>>
>I have never said you was wrong

!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
Mike. .. .
Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:36:37 +0100, Harry Bloomfield
<harry.m1byt(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

>As I read the account, all the signs WERE there for him to go left -
>there was a 1 in ? chance of him going right. ? meaning a slightly
>increased chance to what I would consider a normal risk.

pretty much it.
--
Mike. .. .
Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:03:27 +0100, MrBitsy <ray.keattch(a)infinity.com>
wrote:

>You surprise me - a car going unusually slowly at a turn off should be
>getting a bit more attention than normal.

It was. That's why I didn't let it hit me. You have made stuff up
right through this thread.
--
Mike. .. .
Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.