From: Man at B&Q on
On Aug 5, 10:06 am, "GT" <a...(a)b.c> wrote:
> "FrengaX" <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:50163d77-642a-41ee-917d-ab31c1d87e73(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 4, 11:28 pm, Harry Bloomfield
>
>
>
> <harry.m1...(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> > A week or so ago I decided RAC's increasing insurance renewal cost and
> > their statement in the small print of the renewal - that they would
> > renew it anyway from my provided CC details, was the last straw. So I
> > started shopping around and got myself a much better quote. Much
> > cheaper and it covered for more.
>
> > A very long and detailed form to fill in and one of the questions was
> > how many years NCB - naturally, never having had a claim on my policy
> > in 45 years, I choose the highest number offered of 9 years.
>
> > Then read after agreeing to it and paying for it that they required
> > proof. I have never been asked for proof before and was at a loss, so
> > rang them and they advised contacting my old insurer and asking them to
> > send me proof of the 9 years.
>
> > I had the day before cleaned out my files of old documents for
> > insurance and really had not much idea who I had been with prior to
> > RAC, or how long I had been with them.
>
> > I asked SWMBO if the documents had been shredded, they hadn't and I
> > asked her to try to recover them - but fairly sure none mentioned years
> > of NCB. Since when I have been in a bit of a tiz, rather than wading
> > through the docs I have been too busy sorting other problems out.
>
> > I finally got around to wading through all the pile of documents this
> > evening and my final reminder from RAC just happens to mention I have 9
> > years NCB - PHEW the proof I needed.
>
> > Isn't the whole system of NCB a complete mess?
>
> > Shouldn't NCB be a figure which follows you from one insurer to
> > another, irrespective of how the individual insurer works their NCB and
> > be the TOTAL number of years during which you have made no claim?
>
> > Don't you just wish the online compares gave you cost comparisons for
> > the various options, like TPF&T versus FC - so you could decide which
> > was your best option? I often find FC is cheaper for me than TPF&T.
>
> > Now to check whether RAC renewed my insurance against my specific
> > instruction not too....
>
> Cancel the DD. That way, they can't renew it.
>
> They use your credit card details that you used last time - its not a DD! If
> the card has expired, then you're OK,

Incorrect. They can still make a charge, even if you have cancelled
the card and the card processor will chase you for it.

MBQ
From: boltar2003 on
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 06:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
"Man at B&Q" <manatbandq(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> They use your credit card details that you used last time - its not a DD!=
> If
>> the card has expired, then you're OK,
>
>Incorrect. They can still make a charge, even if you have cancelled
>the card and the card processor will chase you for it.

Sadly true. Which of course begs the question of whats the point of
cancelling a card account if its details can still be used?

I wonder if anyone has tried taking this sort of situation to court - they
cancel a card but someone puts a large bill on it and card company demands
payment.

B2003

From: bod on
Adrian wrote:
> bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> saying:
>
>> Kev, could you tell me the name of your insurer please? I've just
>> renewed and mine was far higher than yours. I have full no claims etc.
>> Or if you prefer, you can email me with the name. Thanks in advance.
>
> There's a whole bunch of factors affect insurance premiums - not least of
> which is your home address. Kev's will be a considerably lower risk area
> than yours.
>
>

Agreed, but always worth checking out.

Bod
From: GT on
"Man at B&Q" <manatbandq(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:54743f7e-6ce0-4b1e-bbb6-dd84f808496d(a)l14g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 5, 10:06 am, "GT" <a...(a)b.c> wrote:
> "FrengaX" <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:50163d77-642a-41ee-917d-ab31c1d87e73(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 4, 11:28 pm, Harry Bloomfield
>
>
>
> <harry.m1...(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> > A week or so ago I decided RAC's increasing insurance renewal cost and
> > their statement in the small print of the renewal - that they would
> > renew it anyway from my provided CC details, was the last straw. So I
> > started shopping around and got myself a much better quote. Much
> > cheaper and it covered for more.
>
> > A very long and detailed form to fill in and one of the questions was
> > how many years NCB - naturally, never having had a claim on my policy
> > in 45 years, I choose the highest number offered of 9 years.
>
> > Then read after agreeing to it and paying for it that they required
> > proof. I have never been asked for proof before and was at a loss, so
> > rang them and they advised contacting my old insurer and asking them to
> > send me proof of the 9 years.
>
> > I had the day before cleaned out my files of old documents for
> > insurance and really had not much idea who I had been with prior to
> > RAC, or how long I had been with them.
>
> > I asked SWMBO if the documents had been shredded, they hadn't and I
> > asked her to try to recover them - but fairly sure none mentioned years
> > of NCB. Since when I have been in a bit of a tiz, rather than wading
> > through the docs I have been too busy sorting other problems out.
>
> > I finally got around to wading through all the pile of documents this
> > evening and my final reminder from RAC just happens to mention I have 9
> > years NCB - PHEW the proof I needed.
>
> > Isn't the whole system of NCB a complete mess?
>
> > Shouldn't NCB be a figure which follows you from one insurer to
> > another, irrespective of how the individual insurer works their NCB and
> > be the TOTAL number of years during which you have made no claim?
>
> > Don't you just wish the online compares gave you cost comparisons for
> > the various options, like TPF&T versus FC - so you could decide which
> > was your best option? I often find FC is cheaper for me than TPF&T.
>
> > Now to check whether RAC renewed my insurance against my specific
> > instruction not too....
>
> Cancel the DD. That way, they can't renew it.
>
> They use your credit card details that you used last time - its not a DD!
> If
> the card has expired, then you're OK,

Incorrect. They can still make a charge, even if you have cancelled
the card and the card processor will chase you for it.


Companies that payments over the phone or internet use 'customer not
present' transactions.
If I cancel a credit card, are you saying it can still be used for these
'customer not present' transactions and I will still be billed - that
doesn't sound right? Online shopping for example?


From: NM on
On 5 Aug, 10:06, "GT" <a...(a)b.c> wrote:
> "FrengaX" <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:50163d77-642a-41ee-917d-ab31c1d87e73(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 4, 11:28 pm, Harry Bloomfield
>
>
>
> <harry.m1...(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> > A week or so ago I decided RAC's increasing insurance renewal cost and
> > their statement in the small print of the renewal - that they would
> > renew it anyway from my provided CC details, was the last straw. So I
> > started shopping around and got myself a much better quote. Much
> > cheaper and it covered for more.
>
> > A very long and detailed form to fill in and one of the questions was
> > how many years NCB - naturally, never having had a claim on my policy
> > in 45 years, I choose the highest number offered of 9 years.
>
> > Then read after agreeing to it and paying for it that they required
> > proof. I have never been asked for proof before and was at a loss, so
> > rang them and they advised contacting my old insurer and asking them to
> > send me proof of the 9 years.
>
> > I had the day before cleaned out my files of old documents for
> > insurance and really had not much idea who I had been with prior to
> > RAC, or how long I had been with them.
>
> > I asked SWMBO if the documents had been shredded, they hadn't and I
> > asked her to try to recover them - but fairly sure none mentioned years
> > of NCB. Since when I have been in a bit of a tiz, rather than wading
> > through the docs I have been too busy sorting other problems out.
>
> > I finally got around to wading through all the pile of documents this
> > evening and my final reminder from RAC just happens to mention I have 9
> > years NCB - PHEW the proof I needed.
>
> > Isn't the whole system of NCB a complete mess?
>
> > Shouldn't NCB be a figure which follows you from one insurer to
> > another, irrespective of how the individual insurer works their NCB and
> > be the TOTAL number of years during which you have made no claim?
>
> > Don't you just wish the online compares gave you cost comparisons for
> > the various options, like TPF&T versus FC - so you could decide which
> > was your best option? I often find FC is cheaper for me than TPF&T.
>
> > Now to check whether RAC renewed my insurance against my specific
> > instruction not too....
>
> Cancel the DD. That way, they can't renew it.
>
> They use your credit card details that you used last time - its not a DD! If
> the card has expired, then you're OK, otherwise they just take it. If it
> were a DD and you cancelled it, then you are breaking a contract and they
> will charge you for the failed DD as well as the renewal amount (been
> there!).

That was tried on me so I called the CC company and told them the card
was stolen, cancelled instantly and new card with different number
issued within 24 hours.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Prev: Petrol and 0.9p
Next: half off topic!