From: Steve Firth on
Nick Finnigan <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote:

> Even if they managed to convince themselves that is the case, they do
> not have reasonable cause to believe that she is committing an insurance
> offence when driving my car.

<sigh>

Do you mistakenly believe that the police have no right to examine
insurance documents?
From: NM on
Steve Firth wrote:
> Nick Finnigan <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Even if they managed to convince themselves that is the case, they do
>> not have reasonable cause to believe that she is committing an insurance
>> offence when driving my car.
>
> <sigh>
>
> Do you mistakenly believe that the police have no right to examine
> insurance documents?

They have no right to demand insurance documents except under certain
laid down circumstances. Imagine walking down a pedestrian shopping mall
when you approached by a pig who demands to see you insurance for a car
which may be 200 miles away and was being driven by a third party 3
weeks ago, Is he within his rights or are you within your to tell him to
foxtrot oscar?
From: Alan Holmes on

"Nick Finnigan" <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message
news:f0cpdd$v4c$1(a)registered.motzarella.org...
> cupra wrote:
>>
>> If he wasn't the driver and the car was being used legally, then no he
>> doesn't have any reason to be worried.
>
> There is reasonable cause to believe the car was being used illegally,
> that is why a NIP was sent out.

I was under the impression that the NIP was for an accusation of exceeding
the speed limit, nothing to do with insurance at all!


From: Nick Finnigan on
Steve Firth wrote:
> Nick Finnigan <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>> Even if they managed to convince themselves that is the case, they do
>>not have reasonable cause to believe that she is committing an insurance
>>offence when driving my car.
>
>
> <sigh>
>
> Do you mistakenly believe that the police have no right to examine
> insurance documents?

No.
From: Silk on
dotmoc(a)gmail.com wrote:
"
> How serious is this statement? Do I have any legal arguments against
> it?

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. These "loop-holes" may be ok if
you have the legal know-how to exploit them. Good lawyers are paid
equally good money. You may be about to find out why.