From: OzOne on 2 Jul 2010 01:21 On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:04:06 +1000, "Brad" <bradleyden(a)spammail.com> wrote: > > ><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message >news:hcfq26960tqleg9qdlmnj5681tsasjsob7(a)4ax.com... >: >: >: >: >> Hydrogen is interesting but a dead-end. >: >: Nope..Far from it. >: Developing steadily and gaining acceptance in California. >: >: >: >: >: OzOne of the three twins >: >: I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. > >It's the whole energy in energy out thing, the car makes no pollution while >driving yet the PowerStation that produces the power to separate and >pressurise the H2 does. Not all power stations are polluters OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 2 Jul 2010 01:34 On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:04:06 +1000, "Brad" <bradleyden(a)spammail.com> wrote: > > ><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message >news:hcfq26960tqleg9qdlmnj5681tsasjsob7(a)4ax.com... >: >: >: >: >> Hydrogen is interesting but a dead-end. >: >: Nope..Far from it. >: Developing steadily and gaining acceptance in California. >: >: >: >: >: OzOne of the three twins >: >: I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. > >It's the whole energy in energy out thing, the car makes no pollution while >driving yet the PowerStation that produces the power to separate and >pressurise the H2 does. You probably should look at this http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/hydprod/hydprod.htm OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: Dan--- on 2 Jul 2010 02:54 "Qansett" <qanset(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4c2095f6$0$582$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au... > Read about this in the motoring section of Sydney Saturday Telegraph. > This car has only 160 kms range on a full battery charge and costs $40K > plus to buy. Unless youre a city driver only, who would buy this car at > that price.? > > Heres the big question: > Why cant they build and electric car that can recharge its > own batteries while in motion.? > > Is there political pressure from the oil companies to stop car makers > from producing such a car. It has been argued that perpetual motion > does NOT exist. I bet Nissan can do it. If you buy a brown one is it called the Nissan Bark? :-p --- Regards Dan.
From: hippo on 3 Jul 2010 09:34
Toby wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:01:02 +1000, Albm&ctd wrote: > > > In article <4c21e547$0$28634$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com>, > > dwalford(a)internode.on.net says... > >> On 23/06/2010 7:05 PM, Milton wrote: > >>> > >>> "Fraser Johnston" <ftrust(a)iinet.net.au> wrote in message > >>> news:88ddesFpnrU1(a)mid.individual.net... > >>>> > >>>> "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote in message > >>>> news:4c2098e6$0$1204$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net... > >>>>> > >>>>> "Qansett" <qanset(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>> news:4c2095f6$0$582$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au... > >>>>> > >>>>>> Heres the big question: > >>>>> > >>>>> Uh-huh..... > >>>>> > >>>>>> Why cant they build and electric car that can recharge its > >>>>>> own batteries while in motion.? > >>>>> > >>>>> And how would you propose that they do that? > >>>> > >>>> Start by chucking the laws of physics in the bin. > >>>> > >>>> Fraser > >>> > >>> Not necessarily all to do with Physics anymore....think beyond the 20th > >>> century. I believe it will happen one day, give it 20/30 years and it > >>> will be all the go. Better batteries/alternators/electric engines and > >>> more than likely, powerplants we can't even imagine today. Open up your > >>> mind and be prepared to venture beyond the square. Who would have > >>> thought 100 years ago, we'd have television 50 years later or mobile > >>> phones with video conferencing. There would have been rules back then to > >>> say it couldn't be done. > >> > >> They don't need to invent perpetual motion for electric vehicles to > >> become a viable alternative to a petrol/diesel vehicles, what they need > >> to do is improve efficiency so that an electric car has a usable range > >> of around 400klm+ and can be fully recharged in about 30mins. > >> When that happens electric cars may be useful for other than short city > >> commuting. > >> > > Why don't they lay a big slot car track with a gov-co robot on the controller, > > then if you get flung off on a corner or caught speeding it's gov-co's fault? > > > > Al > > You are indeed a sayer of sooth. > That's the stage after gaining control of the vehicles speed and status > using Electronic Stability Control signalling interchanges on roads, and > when they're working on that icky steering problem. > But you won't be able to sue, of course, 'cause GovCo will legislate their > slot-car freeways as scientific instruments. Oh bloody great. One minute you're driving to work in your Japanese car and the next, you kill a whale! -- Posted at www.usenet.com.au |