From: OzOne on
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:04:06 +1000, "Brad" <bradleyden(a)spammail.com>
wrote:

>
>
><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
>news:hcfq26960tqleg9qdlmnj5681tsasjsob7(a)4ax.com...
>:
>:
>:
>: >> Hydrogen is interesting but a dead-end.
>:
>: Nope..Far from it.
>: Developing steadily and gaining acceptance in California.
>:
>:
>:
>:
>: OzOne of the three twins
>:
>: I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
>
>It's the whole energy in energy out thing, the car makes no pollution while
>driving yet the PowerStation that produces the power to separate and
>pressurise the H2 does.

Not all power stations are polluters




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:04:06 +1000, "Brad" <bradleyden(a)spammail.com>
wrote:

>
>
><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
>news:hcfq26960tqleg9qdlmnj5681tsasjsob7(a)4ax.com...
>:
>:
>:
>: >> Hydrogen is interesting but a dead-end.
>:
>: Nope..Far from it.
>: Developing steadily and gaining acceptance in California.
>:
>:
>:
>:
>: OzOne of the three twins
>:
>: I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
>
>It's the whole energy in energy out thing, the car makes no pollution while
>driving yet the PowerStation that produces the power to separate and
>pressurise the H2 does.


You probably should look at this

http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/hydprod/hydprod.htm




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: Dan--- on
"Qansett" <qanset(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4c2095f6$0$582$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
> Read about this in the motoring section of Sydney Saturday Telegraph.
> This car has only 160 kms range on a full battery charge and costs $40K
> plus to buy. Unless youre a city driver only, who would buy this car at
> that price.?
>
> Heres the big question:
> Why cant they build and electric car that can recharge its
> own batteries while in motion.?
>
> Is there political pressure from the oil companies to stop car makers
> from producing such a car. It has been argued that perpetual motion
> does NOT exist. I bet Nissan can do it.

If you buy a brown one is it called the Nissan Bark? :-p

---
Regards
Dan.


From: hippo on
Toby wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:01:02 +1000, Albm&ctd wrote:
>
> > In article <4c21e547$0$28634$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com>,
> > dwalford(a)internode.on.net says...
> >> On 23/06/2010 7:05 PM, Milton wrote:
> >>>
> >>> "Fraser Johnston" <ftrust(a)iinet.net.au> wrote in message
> >>> news:88ddesFpnrU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >>>>
> >>>> "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote in message
> >>>> news:4c2098e6$0$1204$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Qansett" <qanset(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>> news:4c2095f6$0$582$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Heres the big question:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Uh-huh.....
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Why cant they build and electric car that can recharge its
> >>>>>> own batteries while in motion.?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And how would you propose that they do that?
> >>>>
> >>>> Start by chucking the laws of physics in the bin.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fraser
> >>>
> >>> Not necessarily all to do with Physics anymore....think beyond the 20th
> >>> century. I believe it will happen one day, give it 20/30 years and it
> >>> will be all the go. Better batteries/alternators/electric engines and
> >>> more than likely, powerplants we can't even imagine today. Open up your
> >>> mind and be prepared to venture beyond the square. Who would have
> >>> thought 100 years ago, we'd have television 50 years later or mobile
> >>> phones with video conferencing. There would have been rules back then to
> >>> say it couldn't be done.
> >>
> >> They don't need to invent perpetual motion for electric vehicles to
> >> become a viable alternative to a petrol/diesel vehicles, what they need
> >> to do is improve efficiency so that an electric car has a usable range
> >> of around 400klm+ and can be fully recharged in about 30mins.
> >> When that happens electric cars may be useful for other than short city
> >> commuting.
> >>
> > Why don't they lay a big slot car track with a gov-co robot on the
controller,
> > then if you get flung off on a corner or caught speeding it's gov-co's
fault?
> >
> > Al
>
> You are indeed a sayer of sooth.
> That's the stage after gaining control of the vehicles speed and status
> using Electronic Stability Control signalling interchanges on roads, and
> when they're working on that icky steering problem.
> But you won't be able to sue, of course, 'cause GovCo will legislate their
> slot-car freeways as scientific instruments.

Oh bloody great. One minute you're driving to work in your Japanese car
and the next, you kill a whale!

--
Posted at www.usenet.com.au