From: Dave Plowman (News) on
In article <5532ppF23brovU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
Ian Johnston <ian.groups(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
> Apparently this one doesn't have a powder clutch - it has a torque
> converter.

Hmm. The idea of a TC is to bridge the fixed ratios in a conventional
auto, and in doing so it wastes rather a lot of power - hence these
transmissions don't get used much in small cars. A CVT doesn't have fixed
ratios so has no need of a torque convertor which would negate the better
efficiency of the design anyway. It could be a fluid flywheel, I suppose,
but again these reduce the efficiency. I think you may need to find an
auto specialist who isn't pulling your plonker...

--
*I'm already visualizing the duct tape over your mouth

Dave Plowman dave(a)davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
From: Ian Johnston on
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:31:24 +0000, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

> In article <5532ppF23brovU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> Ian Johnston <ian.groups(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
>> Apparently this one doesn't have a powder clutch - it has a torque
>> converter.
>
> Hmm. The idea of a TC is to bridge the fixed ratios in a conventional
> auto, and in doing so it wastes rather a lot of power - hence these
> transmissions don't get used much in small cars. A CVT doesn't have fixed
> ratios so has no need of a torque convertor which would negate the better
> efficiency of the design anyway. It could be a fluid flywheel, I suppose,
> but again these reduce the efficiency. I think you may need to find an
> auto specialist who isn't pulling your plonker...

Thanks. The place in question - Mackie's in Glasgow - apparently does all
the overhauling for Nissan UK in Scotland under contract, so I expect they
know what they're on about. "Torque converter" could have been my
mishearing - of course you are quite right that a CVT box shouldn't need
one. Apparently you can tell by looking at the gearbox casing: if it has
an oil filter it doesn't have an electric clutch.

Ian
From: MrCheerful on

"Ian Johnston" <ian.groups(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:553ls8F23brovU14(a)mid.individual.net...
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:31:24 +0000, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
>
>> In article <5532ppF23brovU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
>> Ian Johnston <ian.groups(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
>>> Apparently this one doesn't have a powder clutch - it has a torque
>>> converter.
>>
>> Hmm. The idea of a TC is to bridge the fixed ratios in a conventional
>> auto, and in doing so it wastes rather a lot of power - hence these
>> transmissions don't get used much in small cars. A CVT doesn't have fixed
>> ratios so has no need of a torque convertor which would negate the better
>> efficiency of the design anyway. It could be a fluid flywheel, I suppose,
>> but again these reduce the efficiency. I think you may need to find an
>> auto specialist who isn't pulling your plonker...
>
> Thanks. The place in question - Mackie's in Glasgow - apparently does all
> the overhauling for Nissan UK in Scotland under contract, so I expect they
> know what they're on about. "Torque converter" could have been my
> mishearing - of course you are quite right that a CVT box shouldn't need
> one. Apparently you can tell by looking at the gearbox casing: if it has
> an oil filter it doesn't have an electric clutch.
>
> Ian

depends on the year, later ones ? have a torque converter


From: Dave Plowman (News) on
In article <689Hh.60688$1E3.54418(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
MrCheerful <nbkm57(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks. The place in question - Mackie's in Glasgow - apparently does
> > all the overhauling for Nissan UK in Scotland under contract, so I
> > expect they know what they're on about. "Torque converter" could have
> > been my mishearing - of course you are quite right that a CVT box
> > shouldn't need one. Apparently you can tell by looking at the gearbox
> > casing: if it has an oil filter it doesn't have an electric clutch.
> >
> > Ian

> depends on the year, later ones ? have a torque converter

With a CVT? Can you guess at why? Seems a nonsense to me.

--
*Time is the best teacher; unfortunately it kills all its students.

Dave Plowman dave(a)davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
From: Duncan Wood on
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:59:02 -0000, Dave Plowman (News)
<dave(a)davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <689Hh.60688$1E3.54418(a)fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
> MrCheerful <nbkm57(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks. The place in question - Mackie's in Glasgow - apparently does
>> > all the overhauling for Nissan UK in Scotland under contract, so I
>> > expect they know what they're on about. "Torque converter" could have
>> > been my mishearing - of course you are quite right that a CVT box
>> > shouldn't need one. Apparently you can tell by looking at the gearbox
>> > casing: if it has an oil filter it doesn't have an electric clutch.
>> >
>> > Ian
>
>> depends on the year, later ones ? have a torque converter
>
> With a CVT? Can you guess at why? Seems a nonsense to me.
>


Well it's probably cheaper than a magnetic clutch & if it's attacged to a
CVT you can lock it up almost immediatly.