Nuclear batteries.
in [Technical]
|
From: jim on 18 Apr 2010 22:03 chuckcar wrote: > > > > Ok, to be fair, everybody who said the US has no nuclear power was > > also incorrect.. > > > >> > Yes, that was *you* AFAIK. Misunderstanding my post. I never responded to a post of yours or said anything at all about you, Anything you perceive to be a misunderstanding must due to be something you hallucinated. > > Message-ID: <Xns9D5A87A097B3Achuck(a)127.0.0.1> > > Your reply: > > Message-ID: <jY2dnVLL7a4rj1vWnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d(a)bright.net> > > To a post where I talk about per capita usage and never mention > *anything* about lack or amount of US nuclear power. Nor did Mr. Meyer > ever state such. Mr Meyer claimed the US had no nuclear power. He seemed to later claim he was just echoing what someone else had already said as if that made it somehow correct. > > If you can give me a message ID showing someone else stating the US > has no nuclear power is this thread who you replied to, I of course will > retract the above. > There are plenty of basic NNTP newsreaders available. Get one and try to follow along. -jim > -- > (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
From: E. Meyer on 18 Apr 2010 23:37 On 4/18/10 9:03 PM, in article KaSdneKlMN1iJFbWnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)bright.net, "jim" <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m(a)mwt,net> wrote: > > > chuckcar wrote: > >>> >>> Ok, to be fair, everybody who said the US has no nuclear power was >>> also incorrect.. >>> >>>> >> Yes, that was *you* AFAIK. Misunderstanding my post. > > I never responded to a post of yours or said anything at all about you, > Anything you perceive to be a misunderstanding must due to be something > you hallucinated. > > >> >> Message-ID: <Xns9D5A87A097B3Achuck(a)127.0.0.1> >> >> Your reply: >> >> Message-ID: <jY2dnVLL7a4rj1vWnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d(a)bright.net> >> >> To a post where I talk about per capita usage and never mention >> *anything* about lack or amount of US nuclear power. Nor did Mr. Meyer >> ever state such. > > Mr Meyer claimed the US had no nuclear power. He seemed to later claim > he was just echoing what someone else had already said as if that made > it somehow correct. > Mr. Meyer did NOT claim there US had no nuclear power. As usual you clip the actual thread, state a complete untruth, then start throwing around BS. I copied the actual thread into my comments including my response, yet you insist on picking a comment out of context and running with it. As this is just one of many threads where you've done this, I can only conclude that you are a troll. > > >> >> If you can give me a message ID showing someone else stating the US >> has no nuclear power is this thread who you replied to, I of course will >> retract the above. >> > > There are plenty of basic NNTP newsreaders available. Get one and try > to follow along. > > -jim > > >> -- >> (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
From: jim on 19 Apr 2010 08:03 "E. Meyer" wrote: > > > > Mr Meyer claimed the US had no nuclear power. He seemed to later claim > > he was just echoing what someone else had already said as if that made > > it somehow correct. > > > > Mr. Meyer did NOT claim there US had no nuclear power. As usual you clip > the actual thread, state a complete untruth, then start throwing around BS. > This was the the entire content of the statement you made to which I responded: [quote] The reason the US doesn't have nuclear power now is Three Mile Island. The panic after that resulted a mountain of bureaucracy/red tape/expense that has stopped nuclear power in its tracks. [end quote] I responded that the US has more nuclear power than any other country. > I copied the actual thread into my comments including my response, yet you > insist on picking a comment out of context and running with it. I read the entire thread. Anyone else can too. >As this is > just one of many threads where you've done this, I can only conclude that > you are a troll. Are you requesting that, in the future, you be allowed to make false statements without contradiction? -jim > > > > > > >> > >> If you can give me a message ID showing someone else stating the US > >> has no nuclear power is this thread who you replied to, I of course will > >> retract the above. > >> > > > > There are plenty of basic NNTP newsreaders available. Get one and try > > to follow along. > > > > -jim > > > > > >> -- > >> (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
From: E. Meyer on 19 Apr 2010 11:42 On 4/19/10 7:03 AM, in article _9KdnQ1F1cYF21HWnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d(a)bright.net, "jim" <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m(a)mwt,net> wrote: > > > "E. Meyer" wrote: > >>> >>> Mr Meyer claimed the US had no nuclear power. He seemed to later claim >>> he was just echoing what someone else had already said as if that made >>> it somehow correct. >>> >> >> Mr. Meyer did NOT claim there US had no nuclear power. As usual you clip >> the actual thread, state a complete untruth, then start throwing around BS. >> > > This was the the entire content of the statement you made to which I > responded: > > [quote] > > The reason the US doesn't have nuclear power now is > Three Mile Island. The panic after that resulted a > mountain of bureaucracy/red tape/expense that > has stopped nuclear power in its tracks. > > [end quote] > > I responded that the US has more nuclear power than any other country. > > >> I copied the actual thread into my comments including my response, yet you >> insist on picking a comment out of context and running with it. > > I read the entire thread. Anyone else can too. > > >> As this is >> just one of many threads where you've done this, I can only conclude that >> you are a troll. > > Are you requesting that, in the future, you be allowed to make false > statements without contradiction? > > -jim > Hardly. I'm requesting that in the future you actually read what you are responding to before you go of on totally false and unfounded tangents. > >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> If you can give me a message ID showing someone else stating the US >>>> has no nuclear power is this thread who you replied to, I of course will >>>> retract the above. >>>> >>> >>> There are plenty of basic NNTP newsreaders available. Get one and try >>> to follow along. >>> >>> -jim >>> >>> >>>> -- >>>> (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
From: chuckcar on 19 Apr 2010 12:32
jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m(a)mwt,net> wrote in news:KaSdneKlMN1iJFbWnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)bright.net: > > > chuckcar wrote: > >> > >> > Ok, to be fair, everybody who said the US has no nuclear power was >> > also incorrect.. >> > >> >> >> Yes, that was *you* AFAIK. Misunderstanding my post. > > I never responded to a post of yours or said anything at all > about you, Bullshit. What the hell am I replying to? In addition: Message-ID: <jY2dnVLL7a4rj1vWnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d(a)bright.net> Message-ID: <KaSdneKlMN1iJFbWnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)bright.net> However I *did* find this post: Message-ID: <Xns9D59768856331chuck(a)127.0.0.1> Ending with a Woosh (over your head) and no more posts from that name. Curious. Replying to a completely different nick. Who *absolutely* isn't you. > Anything you perceive to be a misunderstanding must due to be > something you hallucinated. >> No message ID's, no proof. -- (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) ) |