Nuclear batteries.
in [Technical]
|
From: jim on 19 Apr 2010 13:07 "E. Meyer" wrote: > > On 4/19/10 7:03 AM, in article _9KdnQ1F1cYF21HWnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d(a)bright.net, > "jim" <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m(a)mwt,net> wrote: > > > > > > > "E. Meyer" wrote: > > > >>> > >>> Mr Meyer claimed the US had no nuclear power. He seemed to later claim > >>> he was just echoing what someone else had already said as if that made > >>> it somehow correct. > >>> > >> > >> Mr. Meyer did NOT claim there US had no nuclear power. As usual you clip > >> the actual thread, state a complete untruth, then start throwing around BS. > >> > > > > This was the the entire content of the statement you made to which I > > responded: > > > > [quote] > > > > The reason the US doesn't have nuclear power now is > > Three Mile Island. The panic after that resulted a > > mountain of bureaucracy/red tape/expense that > > has stopped nuclear power in its tracks. > > > > [end quote] > > > > I responded that the US has more nuclear power than any other country. > > > > > >> I copied the actual thread into my comments including my response, yet you > >> insist on picking a comment out of context and running with it. > > > > I read the entire thread. Anyone else can too. > > > > > >> As this is > >> just one of many threads where you've done this, I can only conclude that > >> you are a troll. > > > > Are you requesting that, in the future, you be allowed to make false > > statements without contradiction? > > > > -jim > > > > Hardly. I'm requesting that in the future you actually read what you are > responding to before you go of on totally false and unfounded tangents. But that aint what happened. I didn't say anything that was false or off topic - that is just your way of dealing with facts and information you don't like to hear. The only way any new nuclear plants are ever going to be built in the US in is thru government welfare. Private investors are never going to build plants if the plant owners are the ones expected to bear the cost of cleaning up a mishap like 3 mile island. You wish to believe that the taxpayer being forced to pay for the plant owners screw-ups is not welfare, but that takes some deep burial of your head in the sand. It is exactly the same type of arrangement as the safety net we commonly call a "welfare system" - where taxpayers are expected to chip in and pay for the shortcomings of others who can't or won't pay for it themselves. -jim > > > > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> If you can give me a message ID showing someone else stating the US > >>>> has no nuclear power is this thread who you replied to, I of course will > >>>> retract the above. > >>>> > >>> > >>> There are plenty of basic NNTP newsreaders available. Get one and try > >>> to follow along. > >>> > >>> -jim > >>> > >>> > >>>> -- > >>>> (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
From: jim on 19 Apr 2010 13:17 chuckcar wrote: > > jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m(a)mwt,net> wrote in > news:KaSdneKlMN1iJFbWnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)bright.net: > > > > > > > chuckcar wrote: > > > >> > > >> > Ok, to be fair, everybody who said the US has no nuclear power was > >> > also incorrect.. > >> > > >> >> > >> Yes, that was *you* AFAIK. Misunderstanding my post. > > > > I never responded to a post of yours or said anything at all > > about you, > > Bullshit. What the hell am I replying to? Apparently you haven't yet arrived at a level of education where they teach you how the past tense works. Feel free to try again when you develop some language skills.
From: AZ Nomad on 19 Apr 2010 15:53 It's time to quit beating this dead horse. On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:32:14 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar <chuck(a)nil.car> wrote: >jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m(a)mwt,net> wrote in >news:KaSdneKlMN1iJFbWnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)bright.net: >> >> >> chuckcar wrote: >> >>> > >>> > Ok, to be fair, everybody who said the US has no nuclear power was >>> > also incorrect.. >>> > >>> >> >>> Yes, that was *you* AFAIK. Misunderstanding my post. >> >> I never responded to a post of yours or said anything at all >> about you, >Bullshit. What the hell am I replying to? >In addition: >Message-ID: <jY2dnVLL7a4rj1vWnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d(a)bright.net> >Message-ID: <KaSdneKlMN1iJFbWnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)bright.net> >However I *did* find this post: >Message-ID: <Xns9D59768856331chuck(a)127.0.0.1> >Ending with a Woosh (over your head) and no more posts from that >name. Curious. >Replying to a completely different nick. Who *absolutely* isn't you. >> Anything you perceive to be a misunderstanding must due to be >> something you hallucinated. >>> >No message ID's, no proof.
From: cuhulin on 19 Apr 2010 18:13 You beat me to it, AZ Nomad. I was going to say, Gentlemen, isn't it time to play nice? cuhulin
From: chuckcar on 19 Apr 2010 19:13
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3(a)PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote in news:slrnhspd54.fqo.aznomad.3(a)ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net: > > It's time to quit beating this dead horse. > > Fair enough: I showed him where *I* said what he claimed and it wasn't good enough for him. Got to love irony like that <g>. -- (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) ) |