Ok cyclists - is this reasonable behaviour?
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Brimstone on 1 Apr 2010 03:40 "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:wvQsn.568699$DL1.432136(a)newsfe25.ams2... > Brimstone wrote: >> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >> message news:gkLsn.87728$Vh1.71327(a)newsfe15.ams2... >>> Brimstone wrote: >>>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >>>> message news:Mjrsn.8339$Yx6.341(a)newsfe29.ams2... >>>>> mileburner wrote: >>>>>> "Tom Crispin" <kije.remove(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote in >>>>>> message news:98p2r5luklsib36laecsi8m8o18eg1rov9(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, I pay to use the roads twice, once as a motorist and once >>>>>>> as a cyclist. >>>>>> >>>>>> Only twice Tom? >>>>>> >>>>>> You are lucky. >>>>>> >>>>>> I pay as a motorist, cyclist, homeowner, earner, saver, spender, >>>>>> the list goes on... >>>>> >>>>> Motorists pay as motorists, homeowners, earners, savers, spenders. >>>>> And they pay a spefic tax to use the roads. >>>> >>>> That's their choice. >>>> >>>>> What part of that are you too terminally stupid to understand? >>>>> >>>> If people pay money to the government that they don't have to, who >>>> is it that's stupid? >>> >>> So - you don't have to pay road tax to use the roads? I'm sure Mr >>> Darling will be pleased to know that. >>> >> Woooosh. > > It might be if your post made any sense at all. It does because it does. > Try using English. > Try learning to read and comprehend before shooting your mouth off. You'll appear less of a pillock that way.
From: Brimstone on 1 Apr 2010 03:42 "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:bHQsn.568705$DL1.31086(a)newsfe25.ams2... > Brimstone wrote: >> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >> message news:Mjrsn.8339$Yx6.341(a)newsfe29.ams2... >>> mileburner wrote: >>>> "Tom Crispin" <kije.remove(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote in >>>> message news:98p2r5luklsib36laecsi8m8o18eg1rov9(a)4ax.com... >>>>> >>>>> Yes, I pay to use the roads twice, once as a motorist and once as a >>>>> cyclist. >>>> >>>> Only twice Tom? >>>> >>>> You are lucky. >>>> >>>> I pay as a motorist, cyclist, homeowner, earner, saver, spender, the >>>> list goes on... > > OK, lets sort this out for the terminally stupid cyclists who think they > are clever; > >>> Motorists pay as motorists, homeowners, earners, savers, spenders. And >>> they pay a spefic tax to use the roads. >> >> That's their choice. > > What do you mean by that fuckwit? Do they have a choice between not > paying road tax and driving illegally? Or do they have a choice between > driving a car on the roads or not? > > Communicating in English would help, if you can manage that. What's the point, you can't understand a simple sentence. >>> What part of that are you too terminally stupid to understand? >>> >> If people pay money to the government that they don't have to, who is >> it that's stupid? > > I'm not entirely sure who you think 'pays tax they don't have to'? > > Perhaps you could explain, in English, rather than 'thick'? > I communicate with people in terms I believe they can understand, obviously you're even more stupid than you portray yourself to be.
From: mileburner on 1 Apr 2010 04:40 "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:iOWdnewcefX60ynWnZ2dnUVZ7o-dnZ2d(a)bt.com... > > > "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in > message >> >> Perhaps you could explain, in English, rather than 'thick'? >> > I communicate with people in terms I believe they can understand, > obviously you're even more stupid than you portray yourself to be. You would think that someone who calls Vehicle Excise Duty "Road Tax", would understand that "thick" means not very bright, not very clever, or not very intelligent. But then there are some qualities inherent in being a handyman :-)
From: Brimstone on 1 Apr 2010 05:01 "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message news:hp1m5k$f6a$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:iOWdnewcefX60ynWnZ2dnUVZ7o-dnZ2d(a)bt.com... >> >> >> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >> message > >>> >>> Perhaps you could explain, in English, rather than 'thick'? >>> >> I communicate with people in terms I believe they can understand, >> obviously you're even more stupid than you portray yourself to be. > > You would think that someone who calls Vehicle Excise Duty "Road Tax", > would understand that "thick" means not very bright, not very clever, or > not very intelligent. > > But then there are some qualities inherent in being a handyman :-) AUIU it's part of the job spec; intelligence not necessary.
From: boltar2003 on 1 Apr 2010 06:31
On 31 Mar 2010 16:22:54 GMT Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> Oh, do me a favour! >>> >>> You seriously need to get to an optician, followed by BSM, if you >>> actually believe that bollocks. > >> No response. So that would be a no then. That rather says it all. > >Well, quite. A lame cut and paste. You've obviously failed to pass a driving test if you've even bothered to learn and yet you have the gall to lecture and criticise others on their supposedly driving ability. That soapbox you're standing on is looking a little fragile. B2003 |