From: JNugent on 1 Apr 2010 08:42 mileburner wrote: > "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:iOWdnewcefX60ynWnZ2dnUVZ7o-dnZ2d(a)bt.com... >> >> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >> message > >>> Perhaps you could explain, in English, rather than 'thick'? >>> >> I communicate with people in terms I believe they can understand, >> obviously you're even more stupid than you portray yourself to be. > > You would think that someone who calls Vehicle Excise Duty "Road Tax", would > understand that "thick" means not very bright, not very clever, or not very > intelligent. You *must* be thinking of the Labour government, who commissioned, approved and paid for this TV advert: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXoUJN1O8i0&feature=PlayList&p=78B38739A9B28C64&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=24> As you should be able to see and hear, the term "road tax" is used there - both orally and in writing. And this is in an offical government publication. That is because "road tax" is - quite simply - the everyday term used to describe the amount of money one has to pay to the government in respect of the use of a particular motor vehicle on the roads. The certificate displayed on the vehicle to show that the rules have been complied with is known, logically enough, as the road tax disc, or sometimes just "tax disc". You're the one who is in the wrong. That you and certain others don't want to admit that (for reasons of your own) is neither here nor there. "Road Tax" is a perfectly legitimate term in common use. Live with it. > But then there are some qualities inherent in being a handyman :-) If you mean not being blinded by adherence to some sort of class wardare, you might be right.
From: boltar2003 on 1 Apr 2010 08:52 On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 13:40:13 +0100 "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >> Worse than that, he thinks he's serious. > >*I* don't think so. > >He just sitting back having a chuckle to himself. That's why I still read ;) Now clear off, theres only room for one under this bridge. B2003
From: paul george on 1 Apr 2010 09:07 On 1 Apr, 13:42, JNugent <J...(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: > You *must* be thinking of the Labour government, who commissioned, approved > and paid for this TV advert: > > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXoUJN1O8i0&feature=PlayList&p=78B3873...> > > As you should be able to see and hear, the term "road tax" is used there - > both orally and in writing. And this is in an offical government publication. > That is because "road tax" is - quite simply - the everyday term used to > describe the amount of money one has to pay to the government in respect of > the use of a particular motor vehicle on the roads. And "Hoover" is - quite simply - the everyday term used to describe a vacuum cleaner. Doesn't make it the correct term.
From: JNugent on 1 Apr 2010 09:35 paul george wrote: > JNugent <J...(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: >> You *must* be thinking of the Labour government, who commissioned, approved >> and paid for this TV advert: >> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXoUJN1O8i0&feature=PlayList&p=78B3873...> >> As you should be able to see and hear, the term "road tax" is used there - >> both orally and in writing. And this is in an offical government publication. >> That is because "road tax" is - quite simply - the everyday term used to >> describe the amount of money one has to pay to the government in respect of >> the use of a particular motor vehicle on the roads. > And "Hoover" is - quite simply - the everyday term used to describe > a vacuum cleaner. Doesn't make it the correct term. Did you have a point you were trying to make?
From: Adrian on 1 Apr 2010 09:44
boltar2003(a)boltar.world gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>He just sitting back having a chuckle to himself. That's why I still >>read > ;) > > Now clear off, theres only room for one under this bridge. ....and to think, you've denied all along that you're nothing more than a troll... |