Ok cyclists - is this reasonable behaviour?
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Happi Monday on 1 Apr 2010 14:22 On 01/04/2010 19:02, The Medway Handyman wrote: >>> >> Try learning to read and comprehend before shooting your mouth off. >> You'll appear less of a pillock that way. > > I take it from that response you agree it didn't make sense. My interpretation was that he thinks you're a pillock for not understanding it. HTH.
From: Brimstone on 1 Apr 2010 14:54 "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:Nc5tn.44476$OM2.37704(a)newsfe14.ams2... > Brimstone wrote: >> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >> message news:wvQsn.568699$DL1.432136(a)newsfe25.ams2... >>> Brimstone wrote: >>>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >>>> message news:gkLsn.87728$Vh1.71327(a)newsfe15.ams2... >>>>> Brimstone wrote: >>>>>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote >>>>>> in message news:Mjrsn.8339$Yx6.341(a)newsfe29.ams2... >>>>>>> mileburner wrote: >>>>>>>> "Tom Crispin" <kije.remove(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote in >>>>>>>> message news:98p2r5luklsib36laecsi8m8o18eg1rov9(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, I pay to use the roads twice, once as a motorist and once >>>>>>>>> as a cyclist. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only twice Tom? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are lucky. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I pay as a motorist, cyclist, homeowner, earner, saver, spender, >>>>>>>> the list goes on... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Motorists pay as motorists, homeowners, earners, savers, >>>>>>> spenders. And they pay a spefic tax to use the roads. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's their choice. >>>>>> >>>>>>> What part of that are you too terminally stupid to understand? >>>>>>> >>>>>> If people pay money to the government that they don't have to, who >>>>>> is it that's stupid? >>>>> >>>>> So - you don't have to pay road tax to use the roads? I'm sure Mr >>>>> Darling will be pleased to know that. >>>>> >>>> Woooosh. >>> >>> It might be if your post made any sense at all. >> >> It does because it does. >> >>> Try using English. >>> >> Try learning to read and comprehend before shooting your mouth off. >> You'll appear less of a pillock that way. > > I take it from that response you agree it didn't make sense. > Just because you're too stupid to understand it, it doesn't mean that others didn't. Why don't you admit that you're too dumb to understand the consequences of your bawling and shouting?
From: Brimstone on 1 Apr 2010 14:54 "Happi Monday" <happi(a)munday.com> wrote in message news:hp2o9k$f67$2(a)speranza.aioe.org... > On 01/04/2010 19:02, The Medway Handyman wrote: > >>>> >>> Try learning to read and comprehend before shooting your mouth off. >>> You'll appear less of a pillock that way. >> >> I take it from that response you agree it didn't make sense. > > My interpretation was that he thinks you're a pillock for not > understanding it. Your interpretation is correct.
From: Brimstone on 1 Apr 2010 14:59 "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:di5tn.44480$OM2.32443(a)newsfe14.ams2... > Brimstone wrote: >> "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:hp1m5k$f6a$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:iOWdnewcefX60ynWnZ2dnUVZ7o-dnZ2d(a)bt.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >>>> message >>> >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps you could explain, in English, rather than 'thick'? >>>>> >>>> I communicate with people in terms I believe they can understand, >>>> obviously you're even more stupid than you portray yourself to be. >>> >>> You would think that someone who calls Vehicle Excise Duty "Road >>> Tax", would understand that "thick" means not very bright, not very >>> clever, or not very intelligent. >>> >>> But then there are some qualities inherent in being a handyman :-) >> AUIU it's part of the job spec; intelligence not necessary. > > You clearly don't understand anything. > It's quite obvious that most people understand a lot more than you do. Such as what a simple sentence written in English means.
From: Brimstone on 1 Apr 2010 15:01
"The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:4f5tn.44478$OM2.12131(a)newsfe14.ams2... > Brimstone wrote: >> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >> message news:bHQsn.568705$DL1.31086(a)newsfe25.ams2... >>> Brimstone wrote: >>>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >>>> message news:Mjrsn.8339$Yx6.341(a)newsfe29.ams2... >>>>> mileburner wrote: >>>>>> "Tom Crispin" <kije.remove(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote in >>>>>> message news:98p2r5luklsib36laecsi8m8o18eg1rov9(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, I pay to use the roads twice, once as a motorist and once >>>>>>> as a cyclist. >>>>>> >>>>>> Only twice Tom? >>>>>> >>>>>> You are lucky. >>>>>> >>>>>> I pay as a motorist, cyclist, homeowner, earner, saver, spender, >>>>>> the list goes on... >>> >>> OK, lets sort this out for the terminally stupid cyclists who think >>> they are clever; >>> >>>>> Motorists pay as motorists, homeowners, earners, savers, spenders. >>>>> And they pay a spefic tax to use the roads. >>>> >>>> That's their choice. >>> >>> What do you mean by that fuckwit? Do they have a choice between not >>> paying road tax and driving illegally? Or do they have a choice >>> between driving a car on the roads or not? >>> >>> Communicating in English would help, if you can manage that. >> >> What's the point, you can't understand a simple sentence. > > So you can't explain it then? > Intelligent and erudite people don't need to have it explained and only stupid people whine about not having it explained. |