From: Steve Sobol on
In article <hq14uh$57q$1(a)snarked.org>, spam+newsgroups(a)bde-arc.ampr.org
says...


> Yes, we were.

No, we weren't. Do I need to get Message-Id's for you?

> please warn us when you get behind the wheel. You're a clear danger
to
> others.

Being obnoxious doesn't help you make your point.



--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
sjsobol(a)JustThe.net
From: D. Stussy on
"Steve Sobol" <sjsobol(a)JustThe.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.262e611b9fb29a429898e8(a)news.justthe.net...
> In article <hq14uh$57q$1(a)snarked.org>, spam+newsgroups(a)bde-arc.ampr.org
> says...
>
> > Yes, we were.
>
> No, we weren't. Do I need to get Message-Id's for you?

Considering I started this sub-thread with my comment, I'm telling you the
topic didn't change.

> > please warn us when you get behind the wheel. You're a clear danger to
> > others.
>
> Being obnoxious doesn't help you make your point.

Who's being obnoxious? I'm being TRUTHFUL. You obviously can't keep your
mind from wandering in ths simple forum, so why should I think your mind
won't wander when you perform a more complex task such as driving?


From: Steve Sobol on
In article <hq2jan$a0s$1(a)snarked.org>, spam+newsgroups(a)bde-arc.ampr.org
says...
>
> "Steve Sobol" <sjsobol(a)JustThe.net> wrote in message
> news:MPG.262e611b9fb29a429898e8(a)news.justthe.net...
> > In article <hq14uh$57q$1(a)snarked.org>, spam+newsgroups(a)bde-arc.ampr.org
> > says...
> >
> > > Yes, we were.
> >
> > No, we weren't. Do I need to get Message-Id's for you?
>
> Considering I started this sub-thread with my comment, I'm telling you the
> topic didn't change.

Good Lord.

I know damned well what I said.

<MPG.262be8f13bf93bb89898dd(a)news.justthe.net>

That was the previous post I was referring to.

> Who's being obnoxious? I'm being TRUTHFUL. You obviously can't keep
your
> mind from wandering in ths simple forum, so why should I think your mind
> won't wander when you perform a more complex task such as driving?


You're being obnoxious *and* stupid.



--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
sjsobol(a)JustThe.net
From: gpsman on
On Apr 14, 11:19 pm, Scott in SoCal <scottenazt...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I see MFFY behavior no matter what I'm driving.

One can see MFFY from the sidewalk. I can see all I want on blip.tv
from this chair.

> I don't notice any
> more of it when I'm driving my Civic,

Really?

> although it is more difficult to
> escape from assholery when you're driving an underpowered car.

Hm. I would not think a "skilled driver" would have anything
approaching "difficulty" negotiating traffic in a car.

> The MFFY Litmus Test:
> If your maneuver forces another driver WHO HAS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
> to alter course or speed, what you did was probably MFFY.

A MFFY litmus test suggests the obvious.
-----

- gpsman
From: jgar the jorrible on
On Apr 14, 8:19 pm, Scott in SoCal <scottenazt...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> speaking of songs, here's one of my favorites:
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-903455660903712963#

Classic, think I've posted it too.

>
> >(btw Scott, a while back you replied about a VC that said KRETP, but I
> >didn't get around to checking before it scrolled off, could you repost
> >the ref?)
>
> CVC 21654: Slower Traffic Keep Right
>
> http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21654.htm

[going back to what I vaguely remember I would have said in that
thread, without actually checking it] yeah, slower than traffic should
keep right, for normal traffic you do not need to KRETP.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www.nctimes.com/business/article_23bbcc44-d266-5abf-a818-247fd0be6f16.html