From: Steve Sobol on 13 Apr 2010 15:08 In article <hq14uh$57q$1(a)snarked.org>, spam+newsgroups(a)bde-arc.ampr.org says... > Yes, we were. No, we weren't. Do I need to get Message-Id's for you? > please warn us when you get behind the wheel. You're a clear danger to > others. Being obnoxious doesn't help you make your point. -- Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA sjsobol(a)JustThe.net
From: D. Stussy on 13 Apr 2010 16:14 "Steve Sobol" <sjsobol(a)JustThe.net> wrote in message news:MPG.262e611b9fb29a429898e8(a)news.justthe.net... > In article <hq14uh$57q$1(a)snarked.org>, spam+newsgroups(a)bde-arc.ampr.org > says... > > > Yes, we were. > > No, we weren't. Do I need to get Message-Id's for you? Considering I started this sub-thread with my comment, I'm telling you the topic didn't change. > > please warn us when you get behind the wheel. You're a clear danger to > > others. > > Being obnoxious doesn't help you make your point. Who's being obnoxious? I'm being TRUTHFUL. You obviously can't keep your mind from wandering in ths simple forum, so why should I think your mind won't wander when you perform a more complex task such as driving?
From: Steve Sobol on 14 Apr 2010 01:40 In article <hq2jan$a0s$1(a)snarked.org>, spam+newsgroups(a)bde-arc.ampr.org says... > > "Steve Sobol" <sjsobol(a)JustThe.net> wrote in message > news:MPG.262e611b9fb29a429898e8(a)news.justthe.net... > > In article <hq14uh$57q$1(a)snarked.org>, spam+newsgroups(a)bde-arc.ampr.org > > says... > > > > > Yes, we were. > > > > No, we weren't. Do I need to get Message-Id's for you? > > Considering I started this sub-thread with my comment, I'm telling you the > topic didn't change. Good Lord. I know damned well what I said. <MPG.262be8f13bf93bb89898dd(a)news.justthe.net> That was the previous post I was referring to. > Who's being obnoxious? I'm being TRUTHFUL. You obviously can't keep your > mind from wandering in ths simple forum, so why should I think your mind > won't wander when you perform a more complex task such as driving? You're being obnoxious *and* stupid. -- Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA sjsobol(a)JustThe.net
From: gpsman on 15 Apr 2010 01:13 On Apr 14, 11:19 pm, Scott in SoCal <scottenazt...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > I see MFFY behavior no matter what I'm driving. One can see MFFY from the sidewalk. I can see all I want on blip.tv from this chair. > I don't notice any > more of it when I'm driving my Civic, Really? > although it is more difficult to > escape from assholery when you're driving an underpowered car. Hm. I would not think a "skilled driver" would have anything approaching "difficulty" negotiating traffic in a car. > The MFFY Litmus Test: > If your maneuver forces another driver WHO HAS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY > to alter course or speed, what you did was probably MFFY. A MFFY litmus test suggests the obvious. ----- - gpsman
From: jgar the jorrible on 15 Apr 2010 20:38
On Apr 14, 8:19 pm, Scott in SoCal <scottenazt...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > speaking of songs, here's one of my favorites: > > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-903455660903712963# Classic, think I've posted it too. > > >(btw Scott, a while back you replied about a VC that said KRETP, but I > >didn't get around to checking before it scrolled off, could you repost > >the ref?) > > CVC 21654: Slower Traffic Keep Right > > http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21654.htm [going back to what I vaguely remember I would have said in that thread, without actually checking it] yeah, slower than traffic should keep right, for normal traffic you do not need to KRETP. jg -- @home.com is bogus. http://www.nctimes.com/business/article_23bbcc44-d266-5abf-a818-247fd0be6f16.html |