Prev: Longer truck on test in the UK
Next: Drivers inability to judge time and distance.
From: Ian on 2 Dec 2009 18:43
On 1 Dec, 17:20, Harry Bloomfield <harry.m1...(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk>
wrote:

> Now I reckon to be able to manage with just a fraction over 1m. The way
> I do it is to drive nose first into the gap, back out again still going
> forward...

How do you back out forwards?

Ian
From: Conor on 2 Dec 2009 21:08
In article <7KadnSlMu-1TbIvWnZ2dnUVZ7sWdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, Ray Keattch
says...

> Oh blimey, here we go with the measurment down to the inch! Take 'foot'
> to mean about a foot, not a lot more. Maybe it is 16 inches, maybe 15 :-)
>
Still bollox. Try 2ft.



--
Conor
www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk

I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.
From: Ray Keattch on 3 Dec 2009 06:40
Conor wrote:
> In article <7KadnSlMu-1TbIvWnZ2dnUVZ7sWdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, Ray Keattch
> says...
>
>> Oh blimey, here we go with the measurment down to the inch! Take 'foot'
>> to mean about a foot, not a lot more. Maybe it is 16 inches, maybe 15 :-)
>>
> Still bollox. Try 2ft.

Not as much as that.

--
MrBitsy
From: Silk on 3 Dec 2009 07:28
On 02/12/2009 23:04, Ray Keattch wrote:

> A loose 'foot'. If I thought we would get into inches then I would
> measure it! Forget foot - maybe 15 inches, maybe 17 inches, but the
> method once learnt is consistant.

So not actually a foot then.
From: Harry Bloomfield on 3 Dec 2009 13:30
Ray Keattch has brought this to us :
> A loose 'foot'. If I thought we would get into inches then I would measure
> it! Forget foot - maybe 15 inches, maybe 17 inches, but the method once
> learnt is consistant.

So your two foot has now increased (almost) to my 1m :o�

--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Prev: Longer truck on test in the UK
Next: Drivers inability to judge time and distance.