From: Ray Keattch on
Harry Bloomfield wrote:
> Ray Keattch used his keyboard to write :
>> No, not exactly a foot - maybe 13 inches as I haven't measured it.
>> Next to the car it looked about a foot either end.
>
> Oh come on Ray - a foot, 13 inches, 15 to 17 inches - which is it?
>

I don't give a toss down to the inch. From looking at the car it looks
around a foot at either end - a small distance, not a metre, not a long
distance, not 4 inches.

--
MrBitsy
From: Harry Bloomfield on
Ray Keattch expressed precisely :
> I don't give a toss down to the inch.

Ray's getting defensive :o�

> From looking at the car it looks
> around a foot at either end - a small distance, not a metre, not a long
> distance, not 4 inches.

When you get involved with a discussion where inches matter, they
matter.

--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk


From: ChelseaTractorMan on
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:20:06 GMT, Harry Bloomfield
<harry.m1byt(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

>Now I reckon to be able to manage with just a fraction over 1m.

I got by with a metre on a saloon, but with the Tractor its much
harder to see what you are doing, 1.8 is a conservative figure I
reckon.
--
Mike. .. .
Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:52:01 +0000, Ray Keattch
<r.keattch5050(a)btinternet.com> wrote:

> this method works for any car and driver.

for the Tractor when I cannot see the other car in the rear window?
:-)
--
Mike. .. .
Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: Harry Bloomfield on
After serious thinking ChelseaTractorMan wrote :
> On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:52:01 +0000, Ray Keattch
> <r.keattch5050(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>> this method works for any car and driver.
>
> for the Tractor when I cannot see the other car in the rear window?
> :-)

Yes, if the method involves continuing to reverse until you have pushed
the other car far enough to get in :-)

--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk