From: Conor on
In article <MPG.21d533d985a5582698b3d7(a)news.individual.net>, Rob Morley
says...

> Me riding on a fairly narrow country road with a high stone hedge to the
> left and a woodland to the right, approaching a right hand bend. Truck
> starts to overtake me as we turn into the bend, sees something coming
> the other way and pulls over on me, presumably in the belief that once
> I'm behind the cab I must be gone. Actually I was nearly under his back
> wheels, with nowhere to go. There was just room for me to pull back
> level with the cab and thump the door rather hard, he did an emergency
> stop and I squeezed between the cab and the hedge. If I had been a less
> confident cyclist, or not fast enough to keep up with the truck, they'd
> have been scraping me off the road. If I had been squashed, would it
> have been my fault?
>
Bloody hell, you were lucky.

--
Conor

I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
From: Conor on
In article <MPG.21d5b2c05b55edd998b3d9(a)news.individual.net>, Rob Morley
says...

> Front - single wheels - just room to get through
> Back - double wheels - not quite enough room to get through.

Eh? Doesn't make any difference mate. In fact with the front wheels,
you've a higher risk or getting ripped apart by the protruding wheel
studs.

--
Conor

I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
From: NM on
Conor wrote:
> In article <MPG.21d533d985a5582698b3d7(a)news.individual.net>, Rob Morley
> says...
>
>> Me riding on a fairly narrow country road with a high stone hedge to the
>> left and a woodland to the right, approaching a right hand bend. Truck
>> starts to overtake me as we turn into the bend, sees something coming
>> the other way and pulls over on me, presumably in the belief that once
>> I'm behind the cab I must be gone. Actually I was nearly under his back
>> wheels, with nowhere to go. There was just room for me to pull back
>> level with the cab and thump the door rather hard, he did an emergency
>> stop and I squeezed between the cab and the hedge. If I had been a less
>> confident cyclist, or not fast enough to keep up with the truck, they'd
>> have been scraping me off the road. If I had been squashed, would it
>> have been my fault?
>>
> Bloody hell, you were lucky.
>

So was the driver, those panels on the cab are really expensive, it's
cheaper to get you with the rear wheels of the unit.
From: Conor on
In article <5t1bjvF1bf4q1U1(a)mid.individual.net>, Peter Clinch says...
> MrBitsy wrote:
>
> > When the cyclist has done everthing correctly, but the lorry drivers is
> > being a twit, STAY AWAY from the lorry is sensible advice. Of course you
> > could just sit there full of the thought you are in the right.
>
> And now we have an injection of context, but that rather changes things.
> Elsewhere in the thread people have gone on about taking the primary
> position, specifically /right in the way of a lorry/. So, do I do that
> for an upcoming lorry, assuming the driver may be on the ball, or pick
> up my bike and jump onto the pavement, assuning the worst case that he
> won't be? And which of those is closer to "keep clear of lorries"?
>
Cycle to the Highway Code, maintain a steady course and make clear
indications of your intentions.


--
Conor

I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
From: NM on
Conor wrote:

>>
> Cycle to the Highway Code, maintain a steady course and make clear
> indications of your intentions.
>
>
Sounds like the avoidance of collision at sea regulations.