From: George W Frost on

"a" <b(a)invalid.com> wrote in message news:4b5e560b$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote
>
>> You mean those signs warning that the police would be called in such a
>> situation were just a bluff?
>
> Back then when I worked there, yes. Who knows what they'd do now, but
> I still doubt they would call the cops, especially in a busy station.
>
>

They still call the coppers, whether it be a busy station or not
mainly because, it may not have been when you worked there
but today, the operator is responsible for any moneys in the till and for
any losses from that till

So, it is in the interest of the operator to contact the police otherwise,
pay for any losses out of his or her pocket.
Which option would you prefer?


From: atec 77 "atec on
a wrote:
> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote
>
>> You mean those signs warning that the police would be called in such a situation were just a bluff?
>
> Back then when I worked there, yes. Who knows what they'd do now, but
> I still doubt they would call the cops, especially in a busy station.
>
>
Usually a copy of the vid is dropped to the coppers when a complaint is
laid
From: a on
"George W Frost" <georgewfrost(a)gmail.com> wrote

> They still call the coppers, whether it be a busy station or not
> mainly because, it may not have been when you worked there
> but today, the operator is responsible for any moneys in the till and for any losses from that till
>
> So, it is in the interest of the operator to contact the police otherwise, pay for any losses out of his or her pocket.
> Which option would you prefer?

I'm talking about Woolworths Petrol Plus. The operater was NEVER responsible
for lost money due to drive offs or what not. Back in 2005, anyway. I know
from personal experience. I will ask a mate who still works there if the
policy has changed.


From: George W Frost on

"a" <b(a)invalid.com> wrote in message news:4b5e98cf$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> "George W Frost" <georgewfrost(a)gmail.com> wrote
>
>> They still call the coppers, whether it be a busy station or not
>> mainly because, it may not have been when you worked there
>> but today, the operator is responsible for any moneys in the till and for
>> any losses from that till
>>
>> So, it is in the interest of the operator to contact the police
>> otherwise, pay for any losses out of his or her pocket.
>> Which option would you prefer?
>
> I'm talking about Woolworths Petrol Plus. The operater was NEVER
> responsible
> for lost money due to drive offs or what not. Back in 2005, anyway. I know
> from personal experience. I will ask a mate who still works there if the
> policy has changed.
>
>

It is the policy with BP that you are responsible for the cash in the till
Otherwise, you could tell the boss that someone drove off when you were busy
with over $100 worth of fuel and you could put the cash in your pocket


From: Atheist Chaplain on
"a" <b(a)invalid.com> wrote in message news:4b5e98cf$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> "George W Frost" <georgewfrost(a)gmail.com> wrote
>
>> They still call the coppers, whether it be a busy station or not
>> mainly because, it may not have been when you worked there
>> but today, the operator is responsible for any moneys in the till and for
>> any losses from that till
>>
>> So, it is in the interest of the operator to contact the police
>> otherwise, pay for any losses out of his or her pocket.
>> Which option would you prefer?

I would suspect that such a policy would be at best severely frowned upon
and at worst illegal, the operator cannot be held responsible for other
peoples illegal intentions.

--
[This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of
Scientology International]
"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your
Christ." Gandhi