From: George W Frost on 25 Jan 2010 22:16 "a" <b(a)invalid.com> wrote in message news:4b5e560b$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... > "Sylvia Else" <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote > >> You mean those signs warning that the police would be called in such a >> situation were just a bluff? > > Back then when I worked there, yes. Who knows what they'd do now, but > I still doubt they would call the cops, especially in a busy station. > > They still call the coppers, whether it be a busy station or not mainly because, it may not have been when you worked there but today, the operator is responsible for any moneys in the till and for any losses from that till So, it is in the interest of the operator to contact the police otherwise, pay for any losses out of his or her pocket. Which option would you prefer?
From: atec 77 "atec on 26 Jan 2010 01:46 a wrote: > "Sylvia Else" <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote > >> You mean those signs warning that the police would be called in such a situation were just a bluff? > > Back then when I worked there, yes. Who knows what they'd do now, but > I still doubt they would call the cops, especially in a busy station. > > Usually a copy of the vid is dropped to the coppers when a complaint is laid
From: a on 26 Jan 2010 02:24 "George W Frost" <georgewfrost(a)gmail.com> wrote > They still call the coppers, whether it be a busy station or not > mainly because, it may not have been when you worked there > but today, the operator is responsible for any moneys in the till and for any losses from that till > > So, it is in the interest of the operator to contact the police otherwise, pay for any losses out of his or her pocket. > Which option would you prefer? I'm talking about Woolworths Petrol Plus. The operater was NEVER responsible for lost money due to drive offs or what not. Back in 2005, anyway. I know from personal experience. I will ask a mate who still works there if the policy has changed.
From: George W Frost on 26 Jan 2010 06:01 "a" <b(a)invalid.com> wrote in message news:4b5e98cf$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... > "George W Frost" <georgewfrost(a)gmail.com> wrote > >> They still call the coppers, whether it be a busy station or not >> mainly because, it may not have been when you worked there >> but today, the operator is responsible for any moneys in the till and for >> any losses from that till >> >> So, it is in the interest of the operator to contact the police >> otherwise, pay for any losses out of his or her pocket. >> Which option would you prefer? > > I'm talking about Woolworths Petrol Plus. The operater was NEVER > responsible > for lost money due to drive offs or what not. Back in 2005, anyway. I know > from personal experience. I will ask a mate who still works there if the > policy has changed. > > It is the policy with BP that you are responsible for the cash in the till Otherwise, you could tell the boss that someone drove off when you were busy with over $100 worth of fuel and you could put the cash in your pocket
From: Atheist Chaplain on 26 Jan 2010 06:16
"a" <b(a)invalid.com> wrote in message news:4b5e98cf$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... > "George W Frost" <georgewfrost(a)gmail.com> wrote > >> They still call the coppers, whether it be a busy station or not >> mainly because, it may not have been when you worked there >> but today, the operator is responsible for any moneys in the till and for >> any losses from that till >> >> So, it is in the interest of the operator to contact the police >> otherwise, pay for any losses out of his or her pocket. >> Which option would you prefer? I would suspect that such a policy would be at best severely frowned upon and at worst illegal, the operator cannot be held responsible for other peoples illegal intentions. -- [This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of Scientology International] "I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ." Gandhi |