From: Brent on
On 2010-04-05, Craig Zeni <me(a)privacy.net> wrote:
> gpsman wrote:
>> On Apr 5, 2:56 am, Honorable Mention <skycityret...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Apr 4, 9:30 pm, lil abner <@daisey.mae> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1263494/Police-secretly-photo...
>>> Thank you for keeping us informed. I was in TN the other day and
>>> noted that it is far more stressful to drive in that state than it
>>> used to be. Nearly every city and town has red light cameras,
>>> severely underposted speed limits and speed cameras intermittently. I
>>> actually turned around and decided it wasn't worth it to go to one
>>> town after I saw a sign saying they had speed cameras.
>>
>> Perhaps a remedial driving course would not be an unreasonable
>> suggestion.
>>
>>> Add to that
>>> the unmarked police cars.
>>
>> No problem for me. Cops can follow me everywhere, and I wish they
>> would.

>>> Are the people in TN mad about this abuse
>>> of power?
>>
>> Humans have a natural criminal tendency.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retail_loss_prevention#Sources_of_loss.2Fshrink
>>
>> The minority of honest people probably welcome protection from the
>> majority of selfish scumbags and idiots. I know I do.

> Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
> Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

Ideas on how long it takes before gpstroll is pulled over and ticketed
with a cop following him looking for a violation? Even with gpstroll
knowing the cop is there I don't think it will be long at all.


From: necromancer on
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 23:56:29 -0700 (PDT), Honorable Mention
<skycityretail(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>Are the people in TN mad about this abuse
>of power? It hasn't quite gotten this bad in GA yet.

Hopefully, it is trending the other way in GA. Brunswick recently
decided to scrap the RLC's claiming they had accomplished their goal
of improving safety at intersections.

Translation: The cameras are costing more than they are raking in and
as such they go...

--
"One tequila, two tequila, three tequila, floor."
--George Carlin
From: Brent on
> On Apr 5, 11:38�pm, gpsman <gps...(a)driversmail.com> wrote:

>> Do you remember anyone who sacrificed all their liberty for yours, and
>> your temporary safety?

The US military doesn't fight for those things. It fights for special
interests that profit from war. It fights for the rulers of the nation.
It fights for the interests of the Federal Government. That's what it
really does. This is what many people figure out after they've been in
the military for awhile.

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most
vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one
in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives."
-Major General Smedley D. Butler, USMC

Read the rest:
http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket.htm

It was written in the run up to the US getting involved in WW2. The
words have only become more true with the wars since. War is a Racket. A
great racket so long as morons like yourself believe that people are
'dying for our freedom'. What they are dying for is our (and their)
enslavement.

Here, watch what your empire does in the occupied territories:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/55094.html


From: Brent on
On 2010-04-06, N8N <njnagel(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 11:17�am, Brent <tetraethylleadREMOVET...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > On Apr 5, 11:38 pm, gpsman <gps...(a)driversmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Do you remember anyone who sacrificed all their liberty for yours, and
>> >> your temporary safety?
>>
>> The US military doesn't fight for those things. It fights for special
>> interests that profit from war. It fights for the rulers of the nation.
>> It fights for the interests of the Federal Government. That's what it
>> really does. This is what many people figure out after they've been in
>> the military for awhile.
>>
>> "WAR is a racket. It always has been.
>> It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most
>> vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one
>> in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives."
>> -Major General Smedley D. Butler, USMC
>>
>> Read the rest:http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket.htm
>>
>> It was written in the run up to the US getting involved in WW2. The
>> words have only become more true with the wars since. War is a Racket. A
>> great racket so long as morons like yourself believe that people are
>> 'dying for our freedom'. What they are dying for is our (and their)
>> enslavement.

>> Here, watch what your empire does in the occupied territories:http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/55094.html

> I agree to a point, but to apply that with a broad brush to WW2 is
> incorrect IMHO. WW2 was wholly justifiable for two separate reasons -
> first, the attack on US sovereign territory by a hostile entity
> (Japan) and second, the aggression of a separate hostile entity
> against our allies in Europe (Nazi Germany.) Add to that the rampant
> human rights violations (to put it mildly) on the part of both
> adversaries, to the point that "Nazi" has become nearly synonymous
> with genocide.

> Sometimes force *is* the answer, when nothing else works.

I used to think WW2 was the 'good war'. I've learned more and found it
too was just another racket. Rather than get deeply into it, the US
entry into WW2, and perhaps even WW2 in europe itself, was the direct
consequence of US actions in years between the US entry in to WW1 and
1941. The people of the USA were manipulated into war as all people are
by those who wanted it, those who profit from it.

Sure, the empire of Japan attacked the US. After the US federal
government did a series of things that could not have been better
designed to provoke a Japanese attack. In europe, without US entry into
WW1 and without bankers like Prescott Bush, there would not have been a
Hitler to worry about.

The best war ever gets is a war of separation for people to be free of
some ruler(s). But that only works for the people trying to escape if
and only if they too aren't being manipulated by some special interests
looking to profit from the conflict and/or separation.

From: Brent on
On 2010-04-06, hancock4(a)bbs.cpcn.com <hancock4(a)bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 8:16�am, Brent <tetraethylleadREMOVET...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Remember, it's government. Government is force. Calling it "civil" is
>> just their way around our rights. They'll still use force to make you
>> pay.
>
> You didn't complain when said government used force to take away
> people's private property--their land--to make the highway you like to
> drive upon.

1) I have complained about those built recently.
2) I did so here.
3) I have posted in favor of private road systems.
4) I have posted against the government taking private property.

so, it's you who failed to pay attention.