From: Noddy on

"Brad" <google1(a)vk2qq.com> wrote in message
news:732b2567-01d7-4877-ae76-58bb15c44bca(a)v12g2000prb.googlegroups.com...

> The problem of making them non-compulsory is the increased cost to
> society (we must be to blame) and the insurance would be prohibitive.

As I said to Athol in another post, removing the compulsory requirement
wouldn't automatically mean that people would adopt a wholesale non wearing
attitude. In fact, I think the majority are probably very comfortable with
the idea of wearing them and would feel more than a little ill at ease in
not doing so. I'm certainly not suggesting that people don't wear them. Just
that the idea that we need to be told that we *have* to wear them is
ridiculous.

--
Regards,
Noddy.


From: OzOne on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:32:59 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote:

>Posting to Ozliar requires no brain activity.

Should be easy for you....




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:34:50 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote:


>Translation: "I can't think of any sensational bullshit that's going to fly
>at this time of night so I'll just suck it up and bail out".

Actually it was more 'No point replying to someone with your capacity'




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:40:58 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote:

>. Just
>that the idea that we need to be told that we *have* to wear them is
>ridiculous.

Why?
It'll save you paying to keep victims alive....




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: Scotty on

"Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote in message news:4c1614fe$0$78836$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net...
:
: " Scotty" <scoter1(a)warmmail.com> wrote in message
: news:4c1610f7$0$32441$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
:
: > Yet you still remained focused enough to post a few more times to
: > Ozone????
:
: Posting to Ozliar requires no brain activity.

True, you got me there. ;o)

:
: > I urge you to have a look at the videos linked in my earlier post. Quite
: > good I thought....
:
: I've seen the video a number of times. It's been aound for a few years now.
:
: The point I was making is that you posted comments relating to content in
: the video first, and then taged the link to the video onto the end of your
: post which made it difficult to understand what it was you were on about.
: You post would have made more sense if you'd said something like "here,
: watch this video".. posted the link and *then* commented about the content.
:
: > maybe watch them when your not so tired, they may sink in then.
:
: For the umpteenth time, and please read this three or four times before you
: reply just to make sure you get the message, I'm *well* aware of the value
: of seatbelts and *wasn't* saying that people shouldn't wear them. Only
: someone who spent their entire life in a cave in Arkansas could be unaware
: of their value as a road safety tool.
:

Then why not condone the use of them in all seating positions?

: --
: Regards,
: Noddy.
:
:
:
: