Prev: Why the hell do they do this:-
Next: "Call to tackle pollution 'role in 50,000 early deaths' "
From: Bod on 21 Mar 2010 05:38
On 21/03/2010 09:34, john wright wrote:
> On 20/03/2010 08:56, Bod wrote:
>> On 19/03/2010 22:02, john wright wrote:
>>> On 17/03/2010 09:06, Bod wrote:
>>>> On 17/03/2010 00:12, Conor wrote:
>>>>> On 15/03/2010 22:26, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
>>>>>> Conor submitted this idea :
>>>>>>> However....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See me after I'd been stood up for 10-20 minutes or carrying
>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>> and you'd realise just how bad I am but people like you never do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which has what relevance to my comments?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have no problem at all with anyone making full use of a blue
>>>>>> badge, or
>>>>>> the provision of cars for those who have a need for such. I do take
>>>>>> exception to misuse and abuse of either or both provisions.
>>>>>>
>>>>> The point being made is that you're assuming its being abused based on
>>>>> what you see as they get out which may not tell you the full story.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> We have neighbours who use the badge regularly. They also play golf at
>>>> least twice a week, which obviously means walking miles. They
>>>> definitely
>>>> do not need it. I assume they are not alone with taking advantage of
>>>> the
>>>> blue badge.
>>>
>>> But as had been said before they may be in temporary remission from
>>> something like cancer - they, or one of them, may have qualified for
>>> one in the past and may again in the future.
>
>> Definitely not, we know them well.
>
> Furry nuff. But someone must have qualified for one at some time.
>
>

Yes, the husband definitely has dodgy knees, but not dodgy enough to
stop him playing two 18 hole games of golf every week. He also loves
gardening and has no problem doing that for hours on end.

Bod
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Why the hell do they do this:-
Next: "Call to tackle pollution 'role in 50,000 early deaths' "