From: JMS jmsmith2010 on
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 01:37:26 +0100, LanternRouge
<lanternrouge(a)bikerider.com> wrote:

>In article <7ZG6o.64631$RO5.19071(a)hurricane>, davidlang(a)no-spam-
>blueyonder.co.uk says...
>
>> <SNIP UNRELATED OT BOLLOX>
>
>Says Mr car (oops van, pardon me) driving, don't have a bike, troll-a-
>lot. Class act to accuse anyone of posting OT when you are OT before you
>post a


Hello Mr "LanternRouge" - what name did you use to use when posting
here?


From: Tony Raven on
LanternRouge wrote:
> In article <7ZG6o.64631$RO5.19071(a)hurricane>, davidlang(a)no-spam-
> blueyonder.co.uk says...
>
>> <SNIP UNRELATED OT BOLLOX>
>
> Says Mr car (oops van, pardon me) driving, don't have a bike, troll-a-
> lot. Class act to accuse anyone of posting OT when you are OT before you
> post a single word.


Don't mind him. He and JMS are urc's care in the community projects ;-)

Tony

From: The Medway Handyman on
LanternRouge wrote:
> In article <7ZG6o.64631$RO5.19071(a)hurricane>, davidlang(a)no-spam-
> blueyonder.co.uk says...
>
>> <SNIP UNRELATED OT BOLLOX>
>
> Says Mr car (oops van, pardon me) driving, don't have a bike, troll-a-
> lot. Class act to accuse anyone of posting OT when you are OT before
> you post a single word.

First of all SFB's I haven't accused anyone of OT posting. Secondly, my
posts are about cycling - my opinion may differ from yours however.


--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a
viable form of transport.


From: john wright on
On 05/08/2010 23:31, The Medway Handyman wrote:
> Squashme wrote:
>> On 5 Aug, 20:59, "Mrcheerful"<nbk...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>> JMS wrote:
>>>> Reported Road Casualties in Great Britain: Quarterly Provisional
>>>> Estimates Q1 2010 are published today:
>>>
>>>> Highlights - quite good news:
>>>
>>>> Figures cf year ending March 2009
>>>
>>>> Pedestrian casualties down 4%
>>>> Motorcycle casualties down 4%
>>>> Car user casualties down 2%
>>>> Motorcycle users killed or seriously injured down 4%
>>>> Pedestrian KSI down 8%
>>>> Car KSI down 8%
>>>
>>>> Excellent news; Oh - hang on there are a couple missing:
>>>
>>>> Pedal Cyclist casualties UP 4%
>>>> Pedal Cyclist KSI UP 4%
>>>
>>>> Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.
>>>
>>>> It looks like cycling is still more dangerous year on year.
>>>
>>> that is purely caused by helmet, lights and hi-viz wearing, when
>>> will they learn?
>>
>>
>> Don't try and make excuses for motorists, just apologise.
>
> We don't need to do either. We are becoming impresively safer, cyclotwats
> are becoming increasingly more at risk.

If I've said it a million times I'm exagerating, but speed differentials
will always increase risk. Happened with motorcylists too, but they take
steps to make other road users aware of where they are, cyclists need to
do the same, not just moan.

--
John Wright

Pedestrian
From: Terra Nova on
On 5 Aug, 20:59, "Mrcheerful" <nbk...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> JMS wrote:
> > Reported Road Casualties in Great Britain: Quarterly Provisional
> > Estimates Q1 2010 are published today:
>
> > Highlights - quite good news:
>
> > Figures cf year ending March 2009
>
> > Pedestrian casualties down 4%
> > Motorcycle casualties down 4%
> > Car user casualties down 2%
> > Motorcycle users killed or seriously injured down 4%
> > Pedestrian KSI down 8%
> > Car KSI down 8%
>
> > Excellent news; Oh - hang on there are a couple missing:
>
> > Pedal Cyclist casualties UP 4%
> > Pedal Cyclist KSI UP 4%
>
> > Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.
>
> > It looks like cycling is still more dangerous year on year.
>
> that is purely caused by helmet, lights and hi-viz wearing, when will they
> learn?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I don't understand where this complete disregard for fellow citizens/
humans/ people who use a bicycle on the roads comes from? What
motivates someone to come on a website and post such remarks when
someone is trying to enlighten the public as to some figures about
road traffic deaths and serious injuries?