From: Ret. on
Mike P wrote:
> On 27 May, 10:35, Dave Plowman <d...(a)davesound.co.uk> wrote:
>> In article <866ra5Fs3c...(a)mid.individual.net>,
>> Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Got a private plate on your 75 to hide the fact it's six years old?
>>> No? Well, to many people that IS an "ancient banger".
>>
>> How would a private plate cover up the fact a car is six years old?
>> How many remain unchanged in that time?
>
> Rover 75s do ...

Yes indeed - mine is still pristine...

--
Kev
From: Ret. on
Clive George wrote:
> On 27/05/2010 09:53, Ret. wrote:
>> Adrian wrote:
>>> bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like
>>> they were saying:
>>>
>>>>>> I would class most cars as 'mediocre'. If the person likes an
>>>>>> average car, that' all that matters. We can't all afford
>>>>>> Ferraris.
>>>
>>>>> Do you really think that the kind of teenage-boy stats better
>>>>> suited to a game of "Top Trumps" are the only difference between a
>>>>> mediocre car and a good one?
>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> So it was a bit of a silly and irrelevant post, then, wasn't it?
>>
>> As is your comment that the 75 is mediocre when there is a mass of
>> evidence in the form of awards won, and glowing professional
>> reviews, to thoroughly contradict your claim.
>>
>> The motoring press are not backward in criticising cars when they are
>> deserving of criticism. Why do you think that virtually all the
>> reviews are so positive?
>
> You're _so_ predictable. "I'm not going to get drawn in." - yeah,
> right.

Yes, you're right. I just cannot resist challenging blatant untruths...

--
Kev
From: Adrian on
Mike P <mike_w_pearson(a)hotmail.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

>> Yes, you're right. I just cannot resist challenging blatant untruths...

> Or quoting them, going off the fact that you think your Rover is more
> reliable than my Xantia or a 306. Which is not true, according to the
> very survey you linked to yourself

Don't forget the claim that I'm a "boy-racer" and speed is my main
priority.
From: Adrian on
Mike P <mike_w_pearson(a)hotmail.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

> The only complaint I have is that it's a bit breathless at the top end
> which I believe can be sorted out with chipping it.

Not easily - it's an 8v head with a smallish turbo for low-end boost, and
compression high enough that increasing the boost much will cause issues.
In the Xant, the plumbing's also very, very tight.
From: Mike P on
On May 27, 1:02 pm, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Mike P <mike_w_pear...(a)hotmail.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like
> they were saying:
>
> > The only complaint I have is that it's a bit breathless at the top end
> > which I believe can be sorted out with chipping it.
>
> Not easily - it's an 8v head with a smallish turbo for low-end boost, and
> compression high enough that increasing the boost much will cause issues.

I'm *told* it can be pushed up to around 177BHP without any risk with
the standard components. I've seen one with mods pushing out 240BHP
which would be interesting.

> In the Xant, the plumbing's also very, very tight.

I will be getting a double jointed dwarf with especially short arms to
do any turbo or exhaust work I might fancy in the future..

Mike P