Should I or shouldn't I?
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Car detailed with Zaino
Next: Stitched up by a talivan
From: Tom Crispin on 9 Jul 2008 18:29 On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:00:08 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall <devnull(a)woodall.me.uk> wrote: >On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:28:49 +0100, > Tom Crispin <kije.remove(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote: >> I have been offered �5,100 settlement >Is the funny amount to keep it out of the small claims track and >therefore have the potential for a costs award if their final offer is >better than the court awards? No idea. If �5,000 the limit for the small claims court? If so I will be seriously worried about the validity of their assessment.
From: Brimstone on 9 Jul 2008 20:31 Alan Braggins wrote: > In article <tMCdnbPzKPVZY-nVnZ2dnUVZ8vqdnZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone wrote: >> Alan Braggins wrote: >>> In article <D5WdndlrdYWkbenVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone >>> wrote: >>>> I'm not sure that you're even fully acquainted with all the facts >>>> and the reasons why I'm not prepared to give TC an answer. >>> >>> I've given a perfectly good explanation of why you refuse to give >>> TC, or anyone else, an answer, >> >> Wrong. > > Let me guess - you could say why it's wrong, but you won't, because > it's a secret. That's working so well for you so far, isn't it? Have you really got nothing better to do?
From: David Taylor on 10 Jul 2008 02:34 On 2008-07-10, Brimstone <brimstone520-ng03(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Alan Braggins wrote: >> In article <tMCdnbPzKPVZY-nVnZ2dnUVZ8vqdnZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone wrote: >>> Alan Braggins wrote: >>>> In article <D5WdndlrdYWkbenVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone >>>> wrote: >>>>> I'm not sure that you're even fully acquainted with all the facts >>>>> and the reasons why I'm not prepared to give TC an answer. >>>> >>>> I've given a perfectly good explanation of why you refuse to give >>>> TC, or anyone else, an answer, >>> >>> Wrong. >> >> Let me guess - you could say why it's wrong, but you won't, because >> it's a secret. That's working so well for you so far, isn't it? > > Have you really got nothing better to do? No, in the spirit of this thread, the fact that he isn't doing anything better is clearly proof that he has nothing better to do, ever. -- David Taylor
From: Alan Braggins on 10 Jul 2008 03:26 In article <3eqdnVEslNbaxejVnZ2dnUVZ8j6dnZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone wrote: >Alan Braggins wrote: >> In article <tMCdnbPzKPVZY-nVnZ2dnUVZ8vqdnZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone wrote: >>> Alan Braggins wrote: >>>> >>>> I've given a perfectly good explanation of why you refuse to give >>>> TC, or anyone else, an answer, >>> >>> Wrong. >> >> Let me guess - you could say why it's wrong, but you won't, because >> it's a secret. That's working so well for you so far, isn't it? > >Have you really got nothing better to do? I had, but I had a headache and wanted a break that didn't require any concentration. But that and the sore throat are better now, so I shall take your question as a final acceptance that you never had a good answer. *plonk*
From: google on 10 Jul 2008 04:07
On Jul 9, 11:29 pm, Tom Crispin <kije.rem...(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:00:08 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall > > <devn...(a)woodall.me.uk> wrote: > >On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:28:49 +0100, > > Tom Crispin <kije.rem...(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote: > >> I have been offered £5,100 settlement > >Is the funny amount to keep it out of the small claims track and > >therefore have the potential for a costs award if their final offer is > >better than the court awards? > > No idea. If £5,000 the limit for the small claims court? If so I > will be seriously worried about the validity of their assessment. http://www.sfla.co.uk/litigation/small-claims.htm Tim. |