From: Adrian on
"Mortimer" <me(a)privacy.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

>>> I've never owned an auto with a 'tiptronic' type of manual change. I
>>> know several people who do, however, and they never use it. What is
>>> the point of having an automatic gearbox and then changing gear
>>> manually?

>> If you enjoyed driving, you wouldn't need to ask.

> And if you find that the automatic box changes gear at a time when you
> wouldn't change, and you end up "fighting" the box, then manual override
> could be useful. It's an example of a fundamental law of technology:
> anything which is automated should have a manual override for the times
> when the automatic "brain" gets it wrong.

*ding*

Not to mention that I can see a bit further down the road than the 'box
can.
From: Adrian on
"Mortimer" <me(a)privacy.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

> The last time I drove an automatic was about 8 years ago and the car (a
> Ford Focus) didn't have a manual selector to allow manual control of
> gearchanges - it just had PRNDL positions to allow a low gear to be
> selected when going downhill.

Did they use a CVT in the Focus?

> I imagine that a modern automatic would be easier because you could slip
> the lever sideways into manual and it would hold whatever gear it was
> currently in until you manually nudged it up or down a gear.

Why just modern? Even the old-tech 3-spd slusho in the CX had PRND21.
From: Silk on
On 17/06/2010 18:59, Ret. wrote:
> boltar2003(a)boltar.world wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:34:44 +0100
>> bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Most modern autos have a manual selector, why not use that at a
>>> roundabout or whenever necessary?
>>
>> Most of them are manual in name only. In mine it'll still change up
>> and down when it pleases even in manual mode. It just holds onto the
>> revs a bit longer before it does so or before I change it myself.
>> Makes the whole thing a bit of a pointless feature check list
>> exercise really.
>
> I've never owned an auto with a 'tiptronic' type of manual change. I
> know several people who do, however, and they never use it. What is the
> point of having an automatic gearbox and then changing gear manually?

Because no auto box is perfect and if you want to get the best
performance/economy and minimise wear and tear, especially to the
brakes, you need to over-ride it sometimes. The problem with all
automatics is they can only react to situations, where good drivers will
plan.

I thought you would have known all this, being an ex-Police driver and
all that. Although, to be honest, I'd rate my own driving as better than
a lot of the Police advanced drivers I've met. The problem with a lot of
Police Drivers is they may get the best training, but they don't always
get enough actual driving experience.
From: Steve Firth on
Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> > And if you find that the automatic box changes gear at a time when you
> > wouldn't change, and you end up "fighting" the box, then manual override
> > could be useful. It's an example of a fundamental law of technology:
> > anything which is automated should have a manual override for the times
> > when the automatic "brain" gets it wrong.
>
> *ding*
>
> Not to mention that I can see a bit further down the road than the 'box
> can.

OTOH the current Jag autoboxes are astonishing. OK they can't see ahead,
but they drive as if they could.

From: Adrian on
%steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

> OTOH the current Jag autoboxes are astonishing. OK they can't see ahead,
> but they drive as if they could.

A friend of mine tried to flog me a Jag a few years back. Very tempted, I
was. Utterly tidy s3 XJ6.

But...

Manual box and cloth interior.

I could have lived with either of 'em alone. Probably. But the
combination...?