THe GW Scan Is Still Alive, Amazingly
in [Cars]
|
Prev: Besides the Revolution, what influence do the French hve in USculture?
Next: Ridiculous Speed Limits
From: Dave Head on 4 Jul 2010 09:45 On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:35:43 -0230, clouddreamer <Reuse.Recycle(a)Reduce.now> wrote: >We must change the way we live > Or the climate will do it for us. Ain't you figured out yet that GW is a scam? I mean, how plain does it have to get - there's been NO warming for the last 10 year, the East Anglia University bunch's e-mails have exposed their bias and attempt to suppress data that disagrees with what they're promoting, and the GW's refusal to debate the topic at all. They claim that it is settled science, but there are vast numbers of scientists that question it. And then there's this video I really like: http://www.kusi.com/home/78477082.html?video=pop&t=a C'mon, wise up - this GW stuff is just a way to cart wheelbarrow loads of money out of the USA to "do something" about the problem. Even their own approaches such as the Kyoto treaty that failed miserably because nobody lived up to it was supposedly only going to lower the temperature by a few tenths of a degree by year 2100. The only way to do this would be to nuke the planet and kill all the people, but then there's no reason to save the planet, y'know?
From: Harry K on 4 Jul 2010 09:55 On Jul 4, 6:45 am, Dave Head <rally...(a)att.net> wrote: > On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:35:43 -0230, clouddreamer > > <Reuse.Recy...(a)Reduce.now> wrote: > >We must change the way we live > > Or the climate will do it for us. > > Ain't you figured out yet that GW is a scam? I mean, how plain does > it have to get - there's been NO warming for the last 10 year, the > East Anglia University bunch's e-mails have exposed their bias and > attempt to suppress data that disagrees with what they're promoting, > and the GW's refusal to debate the topic at all. They claim that it > is settled science, but there are vast numbers of scientists that > question it. And then there's this video I really like: > > http://www.kusi.com/home/78477082.html?video=pop&t=a > > C'mon, wise up - this GW stuff is just a way to cart wheelbarrow loads > of money out of the USA to "do something" about the problem. Even > their own approaches such as the Kyoto treaty that failed miserably > because nobody lived up to it was supposedly only going to lower the > temperature by a few tenths of a degree by year 2100. > > The only way to do this would be to nuke the planet and kill all the > people, but then there's no reason to save the planet, y'know? And in spite of the denialists constant denials, the ice just keeps on disappearing. Harry K
From: Dave Head on 4 Jul 2010 11:01 On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 06:55:05 -0700 (PDT), Harry K <turnkey4099(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On Jul 4, 6:45�am, Dave Head <rally...(a)att.net> wrote: >> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:35:43 -0230, clouddreamer >> >> <Reuse.Recy...(a)Reduce.now> wrote: >> >We must change the way we live >> > � � � �Or the climate will do it for us. >> >> Ain't you figured out yet that GW is a scam? �I mean, how plain does >> it have to get - there's been NO warming for the last 10 year, the >> East Anglia University bunch's e-mails have exposed their bias and >> attempt to suppress data that disagrees with what they're promoting, >> and the GW's refusal to debate the topic at all. �They claim that it >> is settled science, but there are vast numbers of scientists that >> question it. And then there's this video I really like: >> >> http://www.kusi.com/home/78477082.html?video=pop&t=a >> >> C'mon, wise up - this GW stuff is just a way to cart wheelbarrow loads >> of money out of the USA to "do something" about the problem. �Even >> their own approaches such as the Kyoto treaty that failed miserably >> because nobody lived up to it was supposedly only going to lower the >> temperature by a few tenths of a degree by year 2100. >> >> The only way to do this would be to nuke the planet and kill all the >> people, but then there's no reason to save the planet, y'know? > >And in spite of the denialists constant denials, the ice just keeps on >disappearing. > >Harry K Ya' mean like its been doing since the end of the last ice age? Sure. Oh, wait - ice is thickening in the antarctic.
From: Larry G on 4 Jul 2010 12:00 On Jul 4, 9:45 am, Dave Head <rally...(a)att.net> wrote: > On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:35:43 -0230, clouddreamer > > <Reuse.Recy...(a)Reduce.now> wrote: > >We must change the way we live > > Or the climate will do it for us. > > Ain't you figured out yet that GW is a scam? I mean, how plain does > it have to get - there's been NO warming for the last 10 year, the > East Anglia University bunch's e-mails have exposed their bias and > attempt to suppress data that disagrees with what they're promoting, > and the GW's refusal to debate the topic at all. They claim that it > is settled science, but there are vast numbers of scientists that > question it. And then there's this video I really like: > > http://www.kusi.com/home/78477082.html?video=pop&t=a > > C'mon, wise up - this GW stuff is just a way to cart wheelbarrow loads > of money out of the USA to "do something" about the problem. Even > their own approaches such as the Kyoto treaty that failed miserably > because nobody lived up to it was supposedly only going to lower the > temperature by a few tenths of a degree by year 2100. > > The only way to do this would be to nuke the planet and kill all the > people, but then there's no reason to save the planet, y'know? hmmm. do you think the ozone holes were scams also? and GW.. if we require stricter pollution restrictions - won't that create more jobs and at the same time save fuel making us even more productive?
From: Larry G on 4 Jul 2010 12:00
On Jul 4, 9:55 am, Harry K <turnkey4...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 4, 6:45 am, Dave Head <rally...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:35:43 -0230, clouddreamer > > > <Reuse.Recy...(a)Reduce.now> wrote: > > >We must change the way we live > > > Or the climate will do it for us. > > > Ain't you figured out yet that GW is a scam? I mean, how plain does > > it have to get - there's been NO warming for the last 10 year, the > > East Anglia University bunch's e-mails have exposed their bias and > > attempt to suppress data that disagrees with what they're promoting, > > and the GW's refusal to debate the topic at all. They claim that it > > is settled science, but there are vast numbers of scientists that > > question it. And then there's this video I really like: > > >http://www.kusi.com/home/78477082.html?video=pop&t=a > > > C'mon, wise up - this GW stuff is just a way to cart wheelbarrow loads > > of money out of the USA to "do something" about the problem. Even > > their own approaches such as the Kyoto treaty that failed miserably > > because nobody lived up to it was supposedly only going to lower the > > temperature by a few tenths of a degree by year 2100. > > > The only way to do this would be to nuke the planet and kill all the > > people, but then there's no reason to save the planet, y'know? > > And in spite of the denialists constant denials, the ice just keeps on > disappearing. > > Harry K well you know what the GW skeptics say... "stuff happens". |