Prev: Besides the Revolution, what influence do the French hve in USculture?
Next: Ridiculous Speed Limits
From: Michael Coburn on 16 Jul 2010 12:08 On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:57:25 +0000, Brent wrote: > On 2010-07-15, Larry G <gross.larry(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> so the EPA is really a bunch of enviro wackos and not to be trusted for >> environmental policy? > > In the large picture the EPA serves the political interests of the > insiders. The environment is just the excuse. Yet another conspiracy. -- "Senate rules don't trump the Constitution" -- http://GreaterVoice.org/60
From: Jim Yanik on 16 Jul 2010 12:41 Michael Coburn <mikcob(a)verizon.net> wrote in news:i1q05j229th(a)news3.newsguy.com: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:57:25 +0000, Brent wrote: > >> On 2010-07-15, Larry G <gross.larry(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> so the EPA is really a bunch of enviro wackos and not to be trusted for >>> environmental policy? >> >> In the large picture the EPA serves the political interests of the >> insiders. The environment is just the excuse. > > Yet another conspiracy. > actually,the "Green" movement has been infiltrated by the socialists as the latest method of advancing their communist policies.This has been going on since the 1980's.(USSR's anti-nuke efforts) Note the latest leader of the EPA is a communist-admirer,and appointed by Comrade Obama. So,I guess you can say it IS a "conspiracy". and it goes all the way to the "top". but I suspect you'll "pooh-pooh" this,typical willful blindness. I doubt you'll even look into it. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at localnet dot com
From: Larry G on 16 Jul 2010 13:36 On Jul 16, 12:08 pm, Michael Coburn <mik...(a)verizon.net> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:57:25 +0000, Brent wrote: > > On 2010-07-15, Larry G <gross.la...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> so the EPA is really a bunch of enviro wackos and not to be trusted for > >> environmental policy? > > > In the large picture the EPA serves the political interests of the > > insiders. The environment is just the excuse. > > Yet another conspiracy. so there are NO Environmental groups in the private sector and NO parts of the govt that look after the Environment that can be trusted .... eh? that's the drift I was getting. so..whether we are talking about mercury, ozone holes, GW, dioxin, or even hurricanes... the scientists involved are liberal loonies... who.. stand to make a lot of money convincing the gullible to do things to restrict pollution... eh?
From: Brent on 16 Jul 2010 13:47 On 2010-07-16, Michael Coburn <mikcob(a)verizon.net> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:57:25 +0000, Brent wrote: > >> On 2010-07-15, Larry G <gross.larry(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> so the EPA is really a bunch of enviro wackos and not to be trusted for >>> environmental policy? >> >> In the large picture the EPA serves the political interests of the >> insiders. The environment is just the excuse. > > Yet another conspiracy. Conspiracy? I didn't think the way DC works was anything but and hardly secret. Regulators being from the companies they regulate and going back to them... the whole BP inside track on regulation and inspection even made the mainstream news.... oh that's right, they are just 'incompetent' rather than corrupt. LOL.
From: Brent on 16 Jul 2010 13:57
On 2010-07-16, Larry G <gross.larry(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 16, 12:08�pm, Michael Coburn <mik...(a)verizon.net> wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:57:25 +0000, Brent wrote: >> > On 2010-07-15, Larry G <gross.la...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> so the EPA is really a bunch of enviro wackos and not to be trusted for >> >> environmental policy? >> >> > In the large picture the EPA serves the political interests of the >> > insiders. The environment is just the excuse. >> >> Yet another conspiracy. � > > so there are NO Environmental groups in the private sector and NO > parts of the govt that look after the Environment that can be > trusted .... eh? > > that's the drift I was getting. > > so..whether we are talking about mercury, ozone holes, GW, dioxin, or > even hurricanes... the scientists involved are liberal loonies... > who.. stand to make a lot of money convincing the gullible to do > things to restrict pollution... eh? Look at how regulation is done. The method is conceptionally set up such that it is political. That is those with political power benefit at the expense of those who do not and it allows for the furthering of the agendas of various control freaks to shape society as they desire. When I hear environmental groups demanding a property rights approach to pollution control (effectively as close to zero pollution seen by anyone else as we will ever be able to get) and putting their money where their mouth is by purchasing land and keeping it clean and development free then I'll believe they care more about the environment than they do in shaping the way other people should live. Instead we have global warming the seas will rise we need carbon taxes Al Gore who emits more CO2 through his activities than some third world countries by the sound of it and buys a 9 million dollar beach front home... Actions speak louder than words. The actions routinely point clearly to restrictions and poverty for the masses, everything for the rulers. |