From: Clocky on
Matt Richards wrote:
> On 18/07/2010 4:01 PM, Clocky wrote:
>>
>> Telstra are now providing the backbone, the deal has been done.
>>
>
> Lots of companies will be providing it. Telstra will be providing
> access to their ducting, which will help a lot.
>
> Nextgen are currently building fibre backhaul from Brisbane to Darwin,
> and north from Perth. So it isn't just Telstra.
>

Yeah that's true but it's a complete turnaround from what they planned to do
earlier with regards to Telstra's involvement.


From: Kev on
Noddy wrote:
> "PhilD"<replytonewsgrouponly(a)aussient.com.au> wrote in message
> news:S3t0o.1002$FH2.301(a)viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
>
>> They aren't refugees if they have already passed through safe countries,
>> multiple times, then choose to pay people smugglers to get here by boats.
>> Then within phone range of Australia call "000" to get help and before
>> they
>> are collected by our defence force taxi service they have destroyed all
>> their documentation and on occasions sabotaged their boat.
>
> I think this is a very crucial point most "pro" refugee supporters seem to
> ignore. You give up your status as a bona fide refugee the moment you
> by-pass the nearest safe country.
>
> 100% of the people who enter Australia as "refugees" are doing so illegally,
> and are nothing more that queue jumpers.

I take it you mean those that enter Australia on their own
Plenty of Sudanese and other Africans arriving here. but bought in by
the Govt

Kev


From: Noddy on

"Kev" <kevcat(a)optunet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4c435a71$0$3035$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...

> I take it you mean those that enter Australia on their own

I mean all of them.

Australia has no obligation to take *any* "refugees" except those from
countries that are our immediate neighbours.

> Plenty of Sudanese and other Africans arriving here. but bought in by the
> Govt

The government does lots of things that make sense only to them.

--
Regards,
Noddy.


From: John_H on
Noddy wrote:
>
>If you got called up for national service during the Vietnam War you had to
>go into the army, but you had to volunteer to serve overseas and everyone
>who went to Vietnam elected to go. I'm sure there were some who were
>pressured into going and they really didn't want to be there, but if you
>*really* didn't want to go you could make enough noise about it and miss out
>if you wanted.
>
>Either that, or you could be a conscientious objector and do your two years
>on a prison farm.

Maybe if you were lucky.

I knew a conscientious objector who tried to take the legal way out.
He was handed over to the army by the law court and given the job of
painting army huts with a toothbrush. Nor was he allowed to take the
paint can up the ladder. He survived the two years but wasn't the
full quid when I met him.

Such was/is the military mentality!

The smart path was to obtain a medical exemption. Does anyone know of
any politician's son, Liberal or Labor, who actually did their nacho?

--
John H
From: Noddy on

"John_H" <john4721(a)inbox.com> wrote in message
news:nu0746h1em5iio5n748mo6dcmdqfrh1h75(a)4ax.com...

> Maybe if you were lucky.

Or persistant.

> I knew a conscientious objector who tried to take the legal way out.
> He was handed over to the army by the law court and given the job of
> painting army huts with a toothbrush. Nor was he allowed to take the
> paint can up the ladder. He survived the two years but wasn't the
> full quid when I met him.
>
> Such was/is the military mentality!

I don't know if it still is, but it certainly was. The Army used to survive
on bastardisation.

> The smart path was to obtain a medical exemption. Does anyone know of
> any politician's son, Liberal or Labor, who actually did their nacho?

I've never heard of one :)

--
Regards,
Noddy.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Prev: Report Traffic Incidents 131 700
Next: Who Owned it?