Prev: Report Traffic Incidents 131 700
Next: Who Owned it?
From: Clocky on 18 Jul 2010 07:24 Matt Richards wrote: > On 18/07/2010 4:01 PM, Clocky wrote: >> >> Telstra are now providing the backbone, the deal has been done. >> > > Lots of companies will be providing it. Telstra will be providing > access to their ducting, which will help a lot. > > Nextgen are currently building fibre backhaul from Brisbane to Darwin, > and north from Perth. So it isn't just Telstra. > Yeah that's true but it's a complete turnaround from what they planned to do earlier with regards to Telstra's involvement.
From: Kev on 18 Jul 2010 15:48 Noddy wrote: > "PhilD"<replytonewsgrouponly(a)aussient.com.au> wrote in message > news:S3t0o.1002$FH2.301(a)viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com... > >> They aren't refugees if they have already passed through safe countries, >> multiple times, then choose to pay people smugglers to get here by boats. >> Then within phone range of Australia call "000" to get help and before >> they >> are collected by our defence force taxi service they have destroyed all >> their documentation and on occasions sabotaged their boat. > > I think this is a very crucial point most "pro" refugee supporters seem to > ignore. You give up your status as a bona fide refugee the moment you > by-pass the nearest safe country. > > 100% of the people who enter Australia as "refugees" are doing so illegally, > and are nothing more that queue jumpers. I take it you mean those that enter Australia on their own Plenty of Sudanese and other Africans arriving here. but bought in by the Govt Kev
From: Noddy on 18 Jul 2010 17:30 "Kev" <kevcat(a)optunet.com.au> wrote in message news:4c435a71$0$3035$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au... > I take it you mean those that enter Australia on their own I mean all of them. Australia has no obligation to take *any* "refugees" except those from countries that are our immediate neighbours. > Plenty of Sudanese and other Africans arriving here. but bought in by the > Govt The government does lots of things that make sense only to them. -- Regards, Noddy.
From: John_H on 18 Jul 2010 18:57 Noddy wrote: > >If you got called up for national service during the Vietnam War you had to >go into the army, but you had to volunteer to serve overseas and everyone >who went to Vietnam elected to go. I'm sure there were some who were >pressured into going and they really didn't want to be there, but if you >*really* didn't want to go you could make enough noise about it and miss out >if you wanted. > >Either that, or you could be a conscientious objector and do your two years >on a prison farm. Maybe if you were lucky. I knew a conscientious objector who tried to take the legal way out. He was handed over to the army by the law court and given the job of painting army huts with a toothbrush. Nor was he allowed to take the paint can up the ladder. He survived the two years but wasn't the full quid when I met him. Such was/is the military mentality! The smart path was to obtain a medical exemption. Does anyone know of any politician's son, Liberal or Labor, who actually did their nacho? -- John H
From: Noddy on 18 Jul 2010 19:35
"John_H" <john4721(a)inbox.com> wrote in message news:nu0746h1em5iio5n748mo6dcmdqfrh1h75(a)4ax.com... > Maybe if you were lucky. Or persistant. > I knew a conscientious objector who tried to take the legal way out. > He was handed over to the army by the law court and given the job of > painting army huts with a toothbrush. Nor was he allowed to take the > paint can up the ladder. He survived the two years but wasn't the > full quid when I met him. > > Such was/is the military mentality! I don't know if it still is, but it certainly was. The Army used to survive on bastardisation. > The smart path was to obtain a medical exemption. Does anyone know of > any politician's son, Liberal or Labor, who actually did their nacho? I've never heard of one :) -- Regards, Noddy. |