Prev: Does this ever happen to you?
Next: Public Transit?
From: Matthew Russotto on 15 May 2010 23:28 In article <f42a137d-2070-4181-90c9-6f7bd2ea8242(a)l31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, Larry G <gross.larry(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On May 12, 11:20=A0pm, russo...(a)grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) >wrote: >> In article <0cbd5783-6169-4364-ab23-8e3290929...(a)k2g2000yqe.googlegroups.= >com>, >> Larry G =A0<gross.la...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >until I know more, I'm not going to disagree.... =A0but if true - and we >> >really don't have a way to deal with this kind of blowout if the >> >preventor does fail - then the whole idea of whether or not we should >> >be drilling under those conditions is a question. How many more spills >> >like this do we want? >> >> If your standard is zero risk, you can't accomplish anything at all. > >I totally agree.. but as always the devil is in the details. Does >anyone really think that this is not going to lead to a demand for >changes? It's being used by the usual suspects as an excuse to try to stop drilling entirely. -- The problem with socialism is there's always someone with less ability and more need.
From: Larry G on 16 May 2010 09:21
On May 15, 11:28 pm, russo...(a)grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote: > In article <f42a137d-2070-4181-90c9-6f7bd2ea8...(a)l31g2000yqm.googlegroups..com>, > Larry G <gross.la...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >On May 12, 11:20=A0pm, russo...(a)grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) > >wrote: > >> In article <0cbd5783-6169-4364-ab23-8e3290929...(a)k2g2000yqe.googlegroups.= > >com>, > >> Larry G =A0<gross.la...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >until I know more, I'm not going to disagree.... =A0but if true - and we > >> >really don't have a way to deal with this kind of blowout if the > >> >preventor does fail - then the whole idea of whether or not we should > >> >be drilling under those conditions is a question. How many more spills > >> >like this do we want? > > >> If your standard is zero risk, you can't accomplish anything at all. > > >I totally agree.. but as always the devil is in the details. Does > >anyone really think that this is not going to lead to a demand for > >changes? > > It's being used by the usual suspects as an excuse to try to stop > drilling entirely. I don't think it will stop drilling where it is already taking place and, in fact, if they actually end up developing a technique to stop this blowout - they will use that fact to essentially say that they NOW KNOW how to stop blowout like this and that it will be even safer than before. How's that for "spin"? |