From: Steve B on 22 Jul 2010 12:29 "Vic Smith" <thismailautodeleted(a)comcast.net> wrote > Sparks shouldn't get near the gas jugs, but now that you've mentioned > it, I could get them away from there, and will. > Thanks. I hate two words. Should and probably. Steve visit my blog at http://cabgbypasssurgery.com
From: HeyBub on 22 Jul 2010 14:57 Steve B wrote: > "Vic Smith" <thismailautodeleted(a)comcast.net> wrote > >> Sparks shouldn't get near the gas jugs, but now that you've mentioned >> it, I could get them away from there, and will. >> Thanks. > > I hate two words. Should and probably. > They're different. "Should" implies a moral and superiority judgment on the part of one's self-appointed betters. "Probably" is a dispassionate evaluation of the circumstances by a logical mind.
From: Vic Smith on 22 Jul 2010 15:21 On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:57:01 -0500, "HeyBub" <heybub(a)NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >Steve B wrote: >> "Vic Smith" <thismailautodeleted(a)comcast.net> wrote >> >>> Sparks shouldn't get near the gas jugs, but now that you've mentioned >>> it, I could get them away from there, and will. >>> Thanks. >> >> I hate two words. Should and probably. >> > >They're different. > >"Should" implies a moral and superiority judgment on the part of one's >self-appointed betters. > Could just indicate indecision. >"Probably" is a dispassionate evaluation of the circumstances by a logical >mind. > Unless it's just indecision. Anyway, I avoided both words - until now (-: A friend would sometimes answer a question with "Maybe I might." He just couldn't make up his mind. --Vic
From: Steve B on 22 Jul 2010 16:06 "HeyBub" <heybub(a)NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message news:oJCdnRw3l8rgCdXRnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com... > Steve B wrote: >> "Vic Smith" <thismailautodeleted(a)comcast.net> wrote >> >>> Sparks shouldn't get near the gas jugs, but now that you've mentioned >>> it, I could get them away from there, and will. >>> Thanks. >> >> I hate two words. Should and probably. >> > > They're different. > > "Should" implies a moral and superiority judgment on the part of one's > self-appointed betters. > > "Probably" is a dispassionate evaluation of the circumstances by a logical > mind. Now I hate them even more. AND you. Just kidding about the second part. Steve visit my blog at http://cabgbypasssurgery.com
From: Bill Murphy on 22 Jul 2010 16:21 On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:06:16 -0700, Steve B wrote: > Now I hate them even more. Looking for the law, as far as I can see, California regulates "cargo tanks" which are defined as being over 120 gallons in capacity: http://law.justia.com/california/codes/veh/34000-34006.html I just can't find a law in California for transportation of 5-gallon portable gasoline containers in the trunk of a car yet.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Tire p Question Next: Toyota subpoenaed by federal grand jury, can determine criminal charges |