Turning around in neighbor's driveway
in [Drive]
|
Prev: Would Consumer Reports say this is a shady practice?
Next: Seat Belt: Will You Get Ticketed If You Show Medical Exemption?
From: _ Prof. Jonez _ on 3 May 2007 13:07 tjab wrote: > In article <59srujF2l7n0sU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > _ Prof. Jonez _ <theprof(a)jonez.net> wrote: >> Kent Wills wrote: >> >>> Where's the proof that atheism is correct? Why do you run and >>> hide when I ask about it? >> >> I will gladly show that your pig-ignorant grotesque >> perverted superstition that you call christianity is >> utterly false. >> >> >>> Why, when I gave you the dictionary definition of a valid, >>> verifiable claim, did you stop posting to the thread? >> >> It just illustrated the level of your prevaricating dishonesty. >> >> Why don't you hold your superstitious religious claims to >> the same standard? If you had the honesty to do so >> then my work would be done. >> >>> Time to put up or shut up, stupid. >> >> Ok, don't run away this time ... >> >> So your Holey Baable is the inerrant revealed word of god himself, >> eh? > > Isn't Kent Wills the guy who believes in the Invisible Pink Unicorn > because no one can prove it doesn't exist? Among the infinite other absurdities ... he ain't the sharpest tack in the box, to wit: "There will be NO change in CO2 levels since we exhale carbon monoxide, not carbon dioxide, stupid." -- Kent Wills
From: _ Prof. Jonez _ on 3 May 2007 13:13 Kent Wills wrote: > As I understand it, on Wed, 2 May 2007 19:26:28 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez > _" <theprof(a)jonez.net> wrote: > >> Kent Wills wrote: >>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote: >>> >>> [various snips for brevity] >> >>>> When the jury finds that the person you accused >>>> of being pregnant is in fact not pregnant, then, ipso facto, >>>> your initial allegation/charge is false. >> >>> If the woman in question had put on a great deal of weight and >>> was seen shopping in the maternity section of the store, there was >>> probable cause to believe she was pregnant. That she turned out not >>> to be pregnant doesn't mean the allegation was false. > > > 100% accurate. Is that your final answer? >Thank you for once again letting the Usenet > community know that I proved you wrong. It's not really needed, > seeing as that I do it frequently, but it was and is a nice gesture on > your part. > > Hey, while I have your attention, when are you going to post > the valid, verifiable proof that atheism is correct? You stopped > posting to the thread when I gave you the dictionary definitions of > the words valid and verifiable. You're the one who ran away. I will gladly begin to shred your grotesque perverted bronze-age superstition with valid, verifiable proofs. Let's begin, shall we? You claim your Holey Baable is the inerrant revealed word of god himself, eh? > You aren't running away like you did when I proved that there > was no evidence that the woman who stabbed her baby was/is a Christian > (it's possible she was/is, of course, but the article gave no > indication of *any* religious belief). > And posting a link to a blog with screen caps of someone > else's myspace page, even though she had the same first and last name, > didn't work for anyone but you, stupid. That you reject the evidence a professional gov't investigator posted doesn't mean there is no evidence. So once again your claim is a lie, typical for so called christians like you.
From: Jeckyl on 3 May 2007 13:14 >> _ Prof. Jonez _ <theprof(a)jonez.net> wrote: >>> I will gladly show that your pig-ignorant grotesque >>> perverted superstition that you call christianity is >>> utterly false. Please present this proof.
From: panamfloyd on 3 May 2007 13:47 On May 3, 1:14 pm, "Jeckyl" <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > >> _ Prof. Jonez _ <thep...(a)jonez.net> wrote: > >>> I will gladly show that your pig-ignorant grotesque > >>> perverted superstition that you call christianity is > >>> utterly false. > > Please present this proof. http://www.amazon.com/Bible-Unearthed-Archaeologys-Vision-Ancient/dp/B00009NDAK/ref=pd_sim_b_4/102-6650333-2185739?ie=UTF8&qid=1177725599&sr=1-1 http://www.amazon.com/Who-Wrote-New-Testament-Christian/dp/0060655186/ref=sr_1_1/102-6650333-2185739?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1177725599&sr=1-1 http://www.amazon.com/101-Myths-Bible-Invented-Biblical/dp/1570718423/ref=pd_sim_b_3/102-6650333-2185739?ie=UTF8&qid=1177725599&sr=1-1 http://www.amazon.com/Incredible-Shrinking-Son-Man-Tradition/dp/1591021219/ref=pd_sim_b_2/102-6650333-2185739?ie=UTF8&qid=1177725599&sr=1-1 http://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Puzzle-Christianity-Challenging-Historical/dp/096892591X/ref=pd_rhf_f_2/102-6650333-2185739 http://www.amazon.com/gp/richpub/syltguides/fullview/25YUQDEGQKJS4/ref=cm_syt_dtpa_f_1_rdssss0/102-6650333-2185739?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=sylt-center&pf_rd_r=0WJ0KM37TB3DECYG6XAV&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_p=253457301&pf_rd_i=0766192814 http://home.earthlink.net/~pgwhacker/ChristianOrigins/ http://www.truthbeknown.com/origins.htm http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/source.html You're welcome. -PF
From: Uncle Vic on 3 May 2007 15:16
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: > >> Where's the proof that atheism is correct? Why do you run and >> hide when I ask about it? > (Piggybacking) Atheism is the neutral position. Atheists make no positive claims. Where is your proof the any religion is correct? Uncle Vic |