Turning around in neighbor's driveway
in [Drive]
|
Prev: Would Consumer Reports say this is a shady practice?
Next: Seat Belt: Will You Get Ticketed If You Show Medical Exemption?
From: Jim07D7 on 8 May 2007 07:04 "Fred G. Mackey" <do(a)not.spam> said: >I'm not religious - those who BELIEVE there are no gods are. Since that >is the definition offered by most dictionaries for atheist, atheists are >religious. You are rather selective in your use of the dictionary.
From: Robibnikoff on 8 May 2007 12:41 "Jim07D7" <Jim07D7(a)nospam.net> wrote in message news:u7m043p77qdus0krk0atpb3k0taon39la7(a)4ax.com... > "Fred G. Mackey" <do(a)not.spam> said: > >>I'm not religious - those who BELIEVE there are no gods are. Since that >>is the definition offered by most dictionaries for atheist, atheists are >>religious. > > You are rather selective in your use of the dictionary. Yeah, how convenient :P -- Robyn Resident Witchypoo BAAWA Knight! #1557
From: _ Prof. Jonez _ on 8 May 2007 18:30
Martin Phipps wrote: > On May 8, 7:45 am, Kent Wills <compu...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> As I understand it, on 7 May 2007 03:51:04 -0700, Martin Phipps >> >> <martinphip...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> On May 7, 6:22 pm, Kent Wills <compu...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> As I understand it, on 6 May 2007 18:56:35 -0700, Martin Phipps >> >>>> <martinphip...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Why do you deny it? >> >>>>>> You've offered no proof to convince anyone of your claim. >> >>>>> Why do you godbots always have to lie? >> >>>> Why do *you* have to lie? >> >>> I don't. >> >> OK. Why do you CHOOSE to lie? > > I... don't... lie. > >>> And don't accuse me of lying without proof. >> >> I haven't. The proof is widely available. > > You... are... lying. > >>> If I were in >>> the US right now I would consider suing you for libel. >> >> Feel free. I await your arrival in the U.S. and the >> certified letter from your attorney. > > Are you willing to pay my airfare so I can come to the US? You should > arrange my hotel accomodation while you are at it. > >> Time to put up or shut up. > > No, it is time for you to apologize. The lack of legal recourse on my > part does not change the fact that you have a moral obligation not to > post lies about people. > >> Since there is a possibility of legal action, or you were >> simply blowing hot air, I see no reason for us to continue conversing >> until all legal matters have been resolved in court. > > Which part of "If I were in the US right now" did you not understand? Kent's been huffin' too much carbon monoxide ... |