From: Derek Geldard on
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 13:44:50 +0000 (UTC), boltar2003(a)boltar.world
wrote:

>On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:01:49 +0100
>Derek Geldard <dgg(a)miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>So that's why you suck my fingernails.
>>>
>>>Perhaps that some sort of ironic insult where you come from but I'm afraid
>>>I have no idea what you're talking about but I'll just nod and smile ok?
>>>
>>
>>Situation as per usual.
>
>Why, do you normally get people patting you on the head and smiling?

Nope, only you

> Can't say I'm surprised.

Not got your teeth in ?

Derek

From: Chris Bartram on
On 02/08/10 12:14, Chelsea Tractor Man wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 12:07:43 +0100, GT wrote:
>
>> I frequently see 1 car in L1 doing maybe 60 and then a stream of cars in L2
>> doing 65-70. The L2 'convoy' trails back for 10+ car lengths, but they all
>> just sit there in L2. There is no reason for them all to be in L2 - they are
>> not overtaking anything.
>
> I used to work with a guy who admitted to just sitting in L2 "because its
> easier".
i know someone who does the same 'because it's safer'. <boggle>.
From: Ian Dalziel on
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 07:06:06 +0100, Chelsea Tractor Man
<mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:46:12 +0100, Ian Dalziel wrote:
>
>> No, the Highway Code says you shouldn't. It doesn't constitute the
>> law.
>
>so any accident you cause would be dangerous driving?

Eh? Causing an accident by any means sounds a bit dangerous to me, no?

No, it *can* be used as evidence for a dwdca charge, not dd. Nothing
makes it illegal per se.



--

Ian D
From: GT on
"Nick Finnigan" <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message
news:i36t5e$kvo$2(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> GT wrote:
>>
>> Well how would you define it? I'm referring to the normal dictionary
>> definition - something that you aren't allowed to do as defined and
>> enforced by law - like speeding, driving on the pavement, going through
>> red lights,
>
> There are laws that can be pointed to for those.
>
>> undertaking etc.
>
> Which law do you think covers that?

You mean there isn't one? So its legal? OK, you ask the policeman who stops
you to explain it.


From: GT on
"Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel(a)lineone.net> wrote in message
news:ctff56d0d001g3343186335nnmddf7mjm2(a)4ax.com...
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 07:06:06 +0100, Chelsea Tractor Man
> <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:46:12 +0100, Ian Dalziel wrote:
>>
>>> No, the Highway Code says you shouldn't. It doesn't constitute the
>>> law.
>>
>>so any accident you cause would be dangerous driving?
>
> Eh? Causing an accident by any means sounds a bit dangerous to me, no?
>
> No, it *can* be used as evidence for a dwdca charge, not dd. Nothing
> makes it illegal per se.

So undertaking is covered by the dwdca law then?