From: Noddy on 1 Apr 2010 19:08 "Doug Jewell" <ask(a)and.maybe.ill.tell.you> wrote in message news:2PKdnaTsY614YinWnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d(a)westnet.com.au... > IF - IF that is what happened, then I agree the bloke deserved what > happened, and deserves more. > The story I'd heard was that it was a small amount of wheelspin as he took > off from the lights, and my comments in this thread have been based on > that. IOW a complete over-reaction by the police for something that was > extraordinarily minor. > Probably somewhere between the two is the truth. Not having been there to witness the incident I can't tell you other than to suggest that the report in the paper claims that the *police* allege he did a donut burnout and fishtail up the road before being pulled over. Whether he did that or not I can't tell you, but I'd imagine that if that wasn't the case there were plenty of witnesses to back Hamilton's defence if he should choose to argue the case. -- Regards, Noddy.
From: Albm&ctd on 7 Apr 2010 01:31
In article <n2Esn.16370$pv.10527(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au>, spooky24042(a)hotmail.com says... > It's also illegal. wheel spin, burnouts, donuts...such an antisocial > behaviour that deserves harsh deterrent penalties. Grow up. If > you want to do burnouts, do them in your own driveway and leave > black marks on that. Not on our streets. > Yeah grow up.. or send out a P plater first as a decoy. Al -- I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html |