From: Silk on 31 May 2010 13:20 On 31/05/2010 14:27, Squashme wrote: > On 31 May, 11:41, JNugent<J...(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: >> Squashme wrote: >>> I wonder what his speed was? >>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/10196236.stm >>> Expect the unexpected. Not even London, either. >> >> I thought there was going to be a video. >> > > Awww! Sorry, just the magic of words. You regret coming? I bet your dad does.
From: webreader on 31 May 2010 13:20 On May 31, 4:23 pm, Squashme <squas...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 31 May, 14:44, Halmyre <flashgordonreced...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On 31 May, 14:23, Squashme <squas...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 31 May, 11:41, JNugent <J...(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: > > > > > Squashme wrote: > > > > > I wonder what his speed was? > > > > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/10196236.stm > > > > > Expect the unexpected. Not even London, either. > > > > > I thought there was going to be a video. > > > > > I've stopped from 30 several times when a child has run out into the road. > > > > And I mean stopped, not just swerved around him. > > > > Well done you! And at 20mph you'd probably not have been able to stop, > > > I'll bet. > > > Why would he be unable to stop from 20 if he could stop from 30? > > Because 30 is a most holy number and 30mph is an inalienable right for > motorists. Force them to go lower than 30 and disorder will loom. > > "Take but 30mph away, untune that string, > And, hark, what discord follows!" > > Apparently motorists would not be able to accelerate out of trouble, > and chaos and misrule will come again. And Gog and Magog. And we'll > all be sorry. Can I have a pint of whatever you're on?
From: Harry Bloomfield on 31 May 2010 15:10 After serious thinking JNugent wrote : > I've stopped from 30 several times when a child has run out into the road. Why does this child keep on running out in front of you? -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk
From: ChelseaTractorMan on 1 Jun 2010 01:53 On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:23:16 -0700 (PDT), Squashme <squashme(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Why would he be unable to stop from 20 if he could stop from 30? >> > >Because 30 is a most holy number....... he stopped from 30, simple. The rest is nonsense. -- Mike. .. . Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: JReynold on 5 Jun 2010 16:22 "Squashme" <squashme(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:5636e053-e905-4c8a-9e27-3cfd94354e34(a)e6g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... > I wonder what his speed was? > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/10196236.stm > > Expect the unexpected. Not even London, either. That is how the fat ugly heroin using alcoholic DLA scrounging chavs in this area cross main roads. They just push the pram out and hope cars will stop, even when they are 20ft from a crossing. When the children are killed the fat slags stand in the street demanding speed humps are fitted and speeds are lowered to 20mph. They did that when their own neighbours were stealing cars and racing them about. They wouldn't phone the police and report people, but would complain after accidents. How about stopping unemployed, DLA scrounging alcoholic beer swilling and cake munching fat ugly women from having children. This would stop them acting the way they do to get more benefits. The "fat & thick gene" might vanish over time.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: James May on panda crossings Next: Taxi drivers to block traffic in London. |