From: Adrian on
Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:

>>>> I would say "flash" for a RR Vogue is reasonable

>>> What about an "Autobiography"?

>> I've looked at that post for a full minute, I must be missing
>> something?

> RangeRover Autobiography. The "Exactly what toys would you like, Sir?"
> build-to-order spec. Off-the-shelf Vogues are so gauche.
>
> About half of Rangies around us seem to be Autobiogs.

http://www.landrover.com/gb/en/rr/range-rover/explore/autobiography/
From: Adrian on
Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying:

> There's also the Overfinch. It seems like a waste of money to me.

Never used to be. Chevy v8? Oh, yes, please.
From: Ed Chilada on
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:37:12 +0100, Chelsea Tractor Man
<mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:25:30 +0100, Ed Chilada wrote:
>
>>>having that sticker is knobbish
>>
>> Not really, but it's the opinion that your jealousy m
>
>I'm not jealous, the sticker is knobbish.

Hey look, whilst floundering, you've snipped a load of questions away
again. Here they are again. Let's all see how you choose to avoid them
this time:


> everybody but you thinks so.

Ahh.. implied support for argument, that old chestnut. You really
think "everyone"? Is that everyone in the world? Really? Did you ask
them all?



>>> throwing abuse about
>>
>> Really? Where so?
>
>re read your posts

Please quote. I don't think I'm being abusive so there's no point me
wasting my time looking for something that isn't there. If you think
there is something, quote it.

So far you've suggested that my comment to "grow some balls", was
abusive. However, your "throwing abuse about" claim not only suggests
multiple instances, but it also predates that "grow some balls"
comment - so you can't have been referring to that - must be something
else so please quote it.



>>> and claiming <splutter> he must be OK because he
>>>drives nice cars
>>
>> Where did I say this? Please quote.
>
>I answered that a few minutes ago

Really? Where? I don't recall you quoting where I've apparently been
"claiming he must be OK because he drives nice cars". Try again.
From: Ed Chilada on
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:43:36 +0100, Chelsea Tractor Man
<mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:16:17 +0100, Ed Chilada wrote:
>
>>>> Not really, but it's the opinion that your jealousy m
>>>
>>>I'm not jealous, the sticker is knobbish.
>>
>> Hey look, whilst floundering, you've snipped a load of questions away
>> again. Here they are again. Let's all see how you choose to avoid them
>> this time:
>
>OK

Except you didn't, you snipped again! Do you really think I wouldn't
notice that? Did you really think it wouldn't be painfully obvious why
you're having to do this?

And you *really* think you're not digging here?


>>> everybody but you thinks so.
>>
>> Ahh.. implied support for argument, that old chestnut. You really
>> think "everyone"? Is that everyone in the world? Really? Did you ask
>> them all?
>
>I just answered that elsewhere, I have done several times.

At the time I asked, you hadn't made any stab at answering it and
you've still not actually acknowledged that you clearly have no idea
what support you have for your argument - even though you ache to make
out that everyone agrees with you.

If you really had confidence in your own POV you would argue its own
strengths rather than resort to making out that lots of people agree
with you.



> That goes for the rest of the garbage.

You haven't answered any of it. If you think you have, just cut and
paste your answers in - should be easy if those answers actually
exist and you're not just lying. Here they are again:


>>> throwing abuse about
>>
>> Really? Where so?
>
>re read your posts

Please quote. I don't think I'm being abusive so there's no point me
wasting my time looking for something that isn't there. If you think
there is something, quote it.

So far you've suggested that my comment to "grow some balls", was
abusive. However, your "throwing abuse about" claim not only suggests
multiple instances, but it also predates that "grow some balls"
comment - so you can't have been referring to that - must be something
else so please quote it.



>>> and claiming <splutter> he must be OK because he
>>>drives nice cars
>>
>> Where did I say this? Please quote.
>
>I answered that a few minutes ago

Really? Where? I don't recall you quoting where I've apparently been
"claiming he must be OK because he drives nice cars". Try again.


From: boltar2003 on
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:54:41 +0100
Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>On 26 Jul 2010 08:47:45 GMT, Adrian wrote:
>
>>> There's also the Overfinch. It seems like a waste of money to me.
>>
>> Never used to be. Chevy v8? Oh, yes, please.
>
>only if all the cameras are scrapped! Then I will revise strategy, but it
>will include getting performance with reasonable CO2 and fuel costs. Maybe
>swop the old Hyundai for a Caterham 7!

The thought of a company like Overfinch managing to make a profit out of
souping up a 4x4 wardrobe like the range rover would be funny if it weren't
such a sad inditment of bad taste in this country. If you want a race horse
buy a race horse, don't buy an ox then put a saddle on it and try and make it
neigh. Its just tragic.

B2003


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Prev: credit laons
Next: Road Casualties 2009