From: Ed Chilada on
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:54:43 +0100, Chelsea Tractor Man
<mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:25:57 +0100, Ed Chilada wrote:
>
>> Difference is, he's driving a Range Rover Vogue and a Porsche and
>> you're creating usenet threads about it. You're *super* cool..
>
>I been having a laugh at the expense of a chav

"Do chavs often own Range Rovers and Porsches? Not in my experience,
but is it important to you that you describe him as a chav now?"


> you have been defending a chav

Not particularly - I don't care what he does, such is my ambivalence.
I just pointed out that your need to paint this fella as a "chav",
"prat", "*anker" and whatever else, just because he put a sticker on
his "flash" Range Rover speaks very loudly of jealousy and a chip on
your shoulder.


> throwing abuse about

Really? Where so? And perhaps you should reconsider the very nature of
the thread you started before crying about abuse, lest my hypocrisy
meter should explode.


> and claiming <splutter> he must be OK because he
>drives nice cars

Where did I say this? Please quote.


> who is, to use your word, "cool"?

Actually, you were the first to use the word "cool" in this thread.
not me.


> Not you.

His shoes > my shoes > your shoes. Difference is, I really don't have
a problem with it and I don't feel the need to belittle people who are
clearly doing well and are comfortable with it. Sorry mate, but this
thread you started was pathetic and betrayed the jealousy that I've
already explained. I'm sorry if you can't take bad news well.

From: Adrian on
Ed Chilada <nospam(a)nospam.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:

>>I been having a laugh at the expense of a chav

> "Do chavs often own Range Rovers and Porsches? Not in my experience

Plenty round here. Bentleys, big Audis, similar stuff.

F'rinstance, there's one couple with his & hers plates -
<initials><year>WOW - on a Bentley convertible & Cayenne Turbo.

Or the bodykitted petrol X5 that had P5XCO on it - with fixing stud to
look like "PSYCO". Or the all-black X6M with black alloys and pimptint.
Or the XK with "B16 PAY" (now on a Bentley - but a BMW-engined Arnage,
ffs)

You don't seem to be assuming some correlation between money & taste, do
you?
From: Ed Chilada on
On 21 Jul 2010 16:40:17 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>Ed Chilada <nospam(a)nospam.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
>were saying:
>
>>>I been having a laugh at the expense of a chav
>
>> "Do chavs often own Range Rovers and Porsches? Not in my experience
>
>Plenty round here. Bentleys, big Audis, similar stuff.
>
>F'rinstance, there's one couple with his & hers plates -
><initials><year>WOW - on a Bentley convertible & Cayenne Turbo.
>
>Or the bodykitted petrol X5 that had P5XCO on it - with fixing stud to
>look like "PSYCO". Or the all-black X6M with black alloys and pimptint.
>Or the XK with "B16 PAY" (now on a Bentley - but a BMW-engined Arnage,
>ffs)
>
>You don't seem to be assuming some correlation between money & taste, do
>you?

That's just people who you believe have bad taste and that doesn't
make them a chav - especially when they clearly have lots of money. I
*certainly* wouldn't characterise a chav as having much money (short
of a lottery win). Rarely do they seem to even have jobs and if they
do, it won't be well paid.

Take a look at a few definitions of chav online, and you'll see what I
mean.

From: Mr. Benn on
"Chelsea Tractor Man" <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:r0e24xcl04y8.nyi12tidik2p.dlg(a)40tude.net...
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:36:52 +0100, Ed Chilada wrote:
>
>> And there's something perversely hilarious about spelling semantics
>> wrong.. Of course, you did it on purpose.... right?
>
> your argument technique comprises of focusing on irrelevant detail to the
> exclusion of sense, It isn't interesting, especially when it descending to
> spelling. Why are you so angry?
> It is however, a terrible warning to anybody who uses usenet a lot!

I bet he drives a Vogue with bull bars.

From: Ed Chilada on
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:24:55 +0100, Chelsea Tractor Man
<mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:08:49 +0100, Ed Chilada wrote:
>
>>>The whole thing seems much more important to *you*.
>>
>> Really? How so? It's become amusing to point out the root of your
>> jealous comments, though, I'm happy to admit that!
>
>I'm not jealous of people with nice cars.

Why describe the Range Rover as "flash"? Why start a thread about his
Porsche sticker calling him all sorts of childish names?


> The bloke with the sticker is a knob.

Sorry fella, but from where I sit, comparing a bloke in a Range Rover
that has a Porsche sticker, to another bloke who started an internet
usenet thread about it, specifically to call him childish names
despite knowing next to nothing about him... well there's only one of
those blokes that comes across like a "knob", and it's not him.


> If you think otherwise I do not care.

And I imagine, neither does the RR driver care of your petty yet needy
name calling.


Oh, and you still seem to be avoiding those tricky questions. Can't
you grow a pair and answer them? Can't you actually back up what
you're saying with any substance? Here, I'll post them again so that
you can have a go:


>you seem to think you can judge what people are like from their cars

Not at all, where did I say anything like that? Please quote.

> throwing abuse about

Really? Where so?

> and claiming <splutter> he must be OK because he
>drives nice cars

Where did I say this? Please quote.


Let's see how you choose to weasel away from them this time, whilst
simultaneously trying to make out that some other guy is a "knob"...


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Prev: credit laons
Next: Road Casualties 2009