What a *anker
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: credit laons
Next: Road Casualties 2009
From: Ed Chilada on 23 Jul 2010 07:22 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:15:17 +0100, Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:08:35 +0100, Ed Chilada wrote: > >>>you take the position that somebody with a nice car is automatically >>>"cooler" than somebody who laughs at their crassness (while knowing neither >>>person) >> >> I haven't judged him at all since I don't know him and all I know of >> him are some scant details of his cars. > >you have some information I gave you about his sticker, the point in >question is this:- >Is that the sort of thing "knobs" do or not? You think it isn't. I wouldn't judge the entire personality of a person based on that sticker. He might be, he may well not be. I know I don't have the kind of personality that, upon seeing that sticker and the "flash" Range Rover it was on, would drive me to run to the internet and start a name-calling thread about him - because that's "the sort of thing "knobs" do", when they're jealous. >What sticker have you got? I haven't. Here's the remainder of the questions you avoided this time around, whilst hilariously attempting to make out that someone else is the "knob": Remember how you told me Johnny Depp was cool and Miles Davis too? Can you imagine either of them starting a usenet thread like the one you did? >I'm not jealous of people with nice cars. Why describe the Range Rover as "flash"? Why start a thread about his Porsche sticker calling him all sorts of childish names? > throwing abuse about Really? Where so? > and claiming <splutter> he must be OK because he >drives nice cars Where did I say this? Please quote.
From: Ed Chilada on 23 Jul 2010 07:27 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:19:01 +0100, Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:17:01 +0100, Ed Chilada wrote: > >>>there are no "tricky questions". >> >> Oh of course there are - the ones where I've asked you to back up your >> claims, whilst knowing fully that you won't be able to because they're >> false therefore requiring you to either admit that > >Eh? Hello? McFly? The questions you keep snipping! > Its quite simple sticker - car - knob. Person who runs to the internet and starts a childish name-calling thread about it - super cool. Yeah? Is that how you believe it looks in your head? He's still looking a whole heap cooler than you right now.
From: Ed Chilada on 23 Jul 2010 07:29 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:28:06 +0100, Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:22:33 +0100, Ed Chilada wrote: > >>>you have some information I gave you about his sticker, the point in >>>question is this:- >>>Is that the sort of thing "knobs" do or not? You think it isn't. >> >> I wouldn't judge the entire personality of a person based on that >> sticker. > >but you would agree the sticker is "knobbish"? No. Pretty ambivalent about it TBH. This thread on the other hand.. Here's the remainder of the questions you avoided this time around, whilst hilariously attempting to make out that someone else is the "knob". Grow some balls and answer them: Remember how you told me Johnny Depp was cool and Miles Davis too? Can you imagine either of them starting a usenet thread like the one you did? >I'm not jealous of people with nice cars. Why describe the Range Rover as "flash"? Why start a thread about his Porsche sticker calling him all sorts of childish names? > throwing abuse about Really? Where so? > and claiming <splutter> he must be OK because he >drives nice cars Where did I say this? Please quote.
From: Ed Chilada on 23 Jul 2010 08:18 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:57:41 +0100, Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:29:22 +0100, Ed Chilada wrote: > >> Why describe the Range Rover as "flash"? > >Why indeed, I described it as "new". Are you claiming that you never described it as flash?
From: Ed Chilada on 23 Jul 2010 08:42
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:37:44 +0100, Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:29:22 +0100, Ed Chilada wrote: > >>>but you would agree the sticker is "knobbish"? >> >> No. Pretty ambivalent about it TBH. This thread on the other hand.. > >So basically you think the sticker is OK. I'm ambivalent about it, that's what I said. I certainly wouldn't judge someone on the basis of it, nor would it give me the urge to start an internet thread and call someone names because of it! >> Here's the remainder of the questions you avoided this time around, >> whilst hilariously attempting to make out that someone else is the >> "knob". Grow some balls and answer them: > >further down, you query "abusive"..... haha, that's hardly abusive, I'm not directing abusive terms or name calling at you, I'm simply suggesting that you man-up and answer the questions. Sorry if I said "balls", and you thought that was abusive! >> Remember how you told me Johnny Depp was cool and Miles Davis too? Can >> you imagine either of them starting a usenet thread like the one you >> did? > >The majority of people probably think knobbish behavior is funny enough to >start a thread about. I very much doubt it. Are you honestly going to claim that "the majority of people", had they been there that day and seen what you saw would have gone to the internet and started a thread to call that person some names? Really? I highly doubt that most of the people in this group would have done, nevermind the "majority of people", on the planet. > I cannot imagine Depp or Davis posting here at all. Way too cool and/or dead for that. >>>I'm not jealous of people with nice cars. >> >> Why describe the Range Rover as "flash"? Why start a thread about his >> Porsche sticker calling him all sorts of childish names? > >because its pertinent. The whole point is that the sticker is usually in a >"banger". A new RR Vogue isn't a banger. See Adrians recent post, it sums >it up pretty well. It sums some assumptions, stereotypes and then seems to draw a conclusion from that. I mean, it seems important to the pair of you that this happened in the county of Essex. Are you claiming that had you been elsewhere, you'd have read the situation differently and that the perceived character of this guys depends on the county he happens to be in at the time? Really? >>> throwing abuse about >> >> Really? Where so? > >re read your posts Please quote. I don't think I'm being abusive so there's no point me wasting my time looking for something that isn't there. If you think there is something, quote it. So far you've suggested that my comment to "grow some balls", was abusive. However, your "throwing abuse about" claim not only suggests multiple instances, but it also predates that "grow some balls" comment - so you can't have been referring to that - must be something else so please quote it. >>> and claiming <splutter> he must be OK because he >>>drives nice cars >> >> Where did I say this? Please quote. > >I answered that a few minutes ago Really? Where? I don't recall you quoting where I've apparently been "claiming he must be OK because he drives nice cars". Try again. |